Dozzi92

Half the comments on any given post are a reproduction of some memeified response.

I think that definitely sounds reasonable, and I think, if there's any hope for these tariffs to actually meet their stated purpose, the government of the US would need to just say, if working conditions don't meet the same standards, there will be additional tariffs. I think that's exactly where tariffs ought to be applied, when some country takes advantage of, essentially, human rights. We don't have the right to stop them, but we do have the right to tax their products for it, to the point it's not worth it.

Obviously, that's not how things will go.

That last part for sure resonates. I can't remember if I said it here or elsewhere, but our prices have been subsidized by substandard working conditions in China, there is no way around it. And all because large corporations wanted to make more money. And we, as consumers, shouted a resounded "hell yeah" to those Chinese suicides at Foxcon, because we wanted cheaper components and cheaper phones.

And so I basically don't know how I feel about anything. I try to be more cognizant about what I buy, where it's from, how it's made, but the speed and ease, and basically not having to think, sometimes trumps those thoughts.

The only silver lining I see to the tariffs is that it could end up sticking it to all these large corporations who fought hard to move operations out of the US, to places they knew couldn't meet US worker standards, in order to save money. Obviously, US consumers will feel the pain, but we've been buying products subsidized by Chinese suicides in Foxcon factories, and so perhaps it's a comeuppance.

Disclaimer: I don't know what's going on.

Decade old specs for decade in the future price.

I have not looked beyond the front page of the link you shared here, and I don't mean my criticism to be more than tongue in cheek, but oh boy, $2k for that is.... Something.

Starring Cuba Gooding Junior Jr.

That's great. I'm glad and I would love for it to be the case here. Legalization can, at the very least, open up the doors to the glories of capitalism as far as industries to help people with drug addiction, and presumably we'd get the benefits of good clean drugs and all that.

None of that has to do with smuggling fentanyl into a foreign country and your (deserved) deportation afterwards. Also has nothing to do with an administration who thinks it's funny to post an AI generated image satirizing it. Both of those things are no-nos, in my uneducated opinion.

I'm all for drug legalization. It's not legal, and trying to somehow justify someone coming to America to traffic in fentanyl, which is a straight up killer, is incredibly disingenuous. And Oregon decriminalized drugs and had to walk it back because it became a problem.

Like I said, I'm in favor of it, but that's not what we are dealing with. Someone who crosses a border to sell a deadly drug isn't out here to help people. And if some American rolls into Portugal and starts selling fentanyl, I can assure you it ends up in that person getting removed from Portugal.

Yeah lemme go to my local fentanyl shop. Because she trafficked fentanyl.