this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
834 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

86896 readers
4361 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 59 points 12 hours ago (11 children)

What has AI changed so far?

  • Hardware prices are so far up that nobody can buy good hardware anymore
  • we have AI child porn now, awesome
  • we have AI undressing apps, cool
  • we have AI, the great cheat tool now † we have AI, the confidently wrong 20% of the time tool
  • we have AI, the great misinformation tool
  • we are at the brink of the largest economic collapse in human history caused again by the rich loving to play Russian roulette
  • there are a limited amount of actual useful applications as well, yay

And all it cost us were millions of jobs, thousands of psychosis and deaths, hundreds of new loud polluting data centers, untold amounts of co2 when were right smack in the mids of a climate crisis...

I'm not advocating for murdering the AI CEOs, but I'm definitely a fan of at least permanent tarring and feathering

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's not lying if they have no idea what they're talking about and constantly swoon over it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 32 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I see a lot of useless people creating a ton of busy work that just becomes an unbearable workload for the people under them. Working in manufacturing environments which (you aren't gonna believe this) are all horrifically understaffed is bad enough. Now i get to watch good workers get buried under Solvace/Fabriq/etc checklists and Leading2Lean/PerformOEE/etc task lists and spreadsheets and meetings to discuss kpis and metrics.

I need a new line of work

[–] ladybugs@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

Hate to day it, but every industry has turned into that. At least in my anecdotal experience and my network’s anecdotal experience, useless people using AI to create shit that means extra work for others is happening everywhere. Not saying you should stay in manufacturing if you hate it, but just be aware that you probably won’t be leaving that issue behind.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, right. My boss gave me a bunch of risk assessments to read through and let slip that AI had 'helped' produce them. So I said I'd get AI to summarise them. All this vast computing power and climate damage is being used for bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 8 hours ago

Well, he hasn't been describing our future for at least two decades. /sarcasm

[–] eah@programming.dev 98 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

In other words, corporate leadership is starting from the premise that AI has (or will) radically change the business, and they're working backwards from that premise to find the evidence to support this article of faith.

Sounds familiar. The proof-of-work blockchain scheme which was the fad a while ago is also often described as a solution in search of a problem.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

I'm glad you specifically pointed out proof-of-work blockchains.
They're very inefficient (economically and ecologically) by design. In almost all cases this design isn't warranted.
Alas there are other designs and while most of them are rubbish as well, a few ones are doing things quite right.

I hope that just like other schemes than proof-of-work were thought of regarding blockchains, there will be AI models that are way, way more efficient and ideally can be run locally - for those cases that can use AI...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 29 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

I feel like block chain as a public ledger has found quite a few purposeful uses, and was a solution to a handful of problems most people rarely if ever encounter. Then fake money got involved

[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 14 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The core issue feels like the dead torrent problem.

Its distributed, so it needs to be hosted, by several locations. Which becomes probitive over time as.it becomes huge. Its also massively inefficient for what its trying to do.

At some point, its basically just one server farm somewhere hosting a glorified MySWL database that doubles as a space heater for the entire planet every time you need to add a row.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 17 points 12 hours ago

AI is changing everything... Mostly to bad, that's the part they keep.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

But it IS changing everything, and not in a good way

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 14 points 12 hours ago

It's a self-fulfilling prophecy: if all the corporate leaders believe it will change everything and, in a fit of FOMO, force it into every corner of our lives, then everything will be changed. But not so much because of what AI can do, as because of a mass delusion among the LinkedIn types.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

It's changing a lot of things, but many of them in only relatively minor ways. It's not affecting e.g. food supply systems in a significant way - it might be screwing up the management structures of companies involved, but that will be repairable fairly quickly..

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 22 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

If AI data centers drastically accelerate us towards a point of no return for climate change, then they will in fact have “changed everything”.

[–] HostilePasta@lemmy.ml 10 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but we're already past the point of no return.

The climate is changing more drastically every year. Hurricanes and typhoons are more severe and the season lasts longer than just a couple years ago. Thunderstorms are more severe, with longer and hotter periods between them and fewer regular rain events. Ocean currents are changing and stopping, meaning the flows that sea life use aren't there. There is no longer a constant polar ice cap on the north pole.

We will not be staying under 2°C average warming, which was the target back in 2010.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

The question isn't where the point of no return is - we've been beyond those the whole time. The question is how bad we want to let it get. Ever fraction of a degree extra warming means worse impacts.

Agree that less than +2°C is unlikely (though not completely impossible). But still, better that than +2.5°C, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

In the near future an ai company will turn on their ASI and ask it what to do about climate change and it will say "first off shut me down, second off eat the rich" and only then will we know we did it

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FerrisEuler@programming.dev 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

This moment in history is a lot like when power tools were first invented. The bad news is corporate leaders seem to view AI as a means to downsize people. The good news is that AI lets many people who formerly lacked the ability to do anything on their own to move on the "I wish I could do ____. but _____" ideas in their head. It could be anything. You can run a competent local AI model in LM Studio with a $1000 gaming PC or you can pay $20 a month to run a frontier-quality open weights model without the usage limits of the big names. The free AIs can help you get started on doing that. Big companies are using AI for a lot of stupid crap that they try to make sound very profound. They assume customer service and quality assurance are no longer "a thing". This era reminds me of the 1970s when Bill Gates and Steve Jobs had their opening. Sometimes the big guys get sloppy. We're at that point right now. Enshittification is everywhere.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

never seen it helpful to anyone, except for the people wanting to do the layoffs. most of the time it gives misinformation to people looking for abstract-to-reality ideas.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AgentSeven@lemmy.zip 36 points 17 hours ago (55 children)

It has become impossible to tell managers mesmerised by artificial intelligence that the tools are not, in fact, helpful.

This is stupid. The tools are helpful. Overhyped? Sure. But to pretend they are in no way helpful is just wrong.

load more comments (55 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's also notable that MBAs tend to be people who are into the networking versus the work and they will follow the trends wherever they leave because that's what good monkeys do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›