this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
690 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

86896 readers
4385 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Slashme@lemmy.world 26 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I typed into Google "potatoes pressure cooker" to get a reminder of how long to cook them. The AI told me, and correctly said that I should use the steamer sieve, but also told me to salt the water. The water that would be under the potatoes and that wouldn't touch them.

I asked why, and the AI said that little splashes of salt water from the boiling would land on the surface of the potatoes and salt them gently, that the salt would increase the boiling temperature, and that the vapour would be aromatic.

I pointed out that the amount of salt landing on the surface of the potatoes would be negligible, that the vapour is distilled water in gas form, and that the increase in boiling temperature from salting the water is less than 1°C. The AI said, oh yeah, you're right on all counts. Don't salt the water.

What it has been doing was exactly what an LLM does. It gave me the received wisdom from the internet.

That aligns with what Cory Doctorow was saying here, namely that all the AI successes were from people who already knew what they were doing and could use the AI as a tool. Not from people who had no clue and just let AI do the job.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Salting the water would increase the boiling temperature I guess, but it seems like a waste of salt because that info isn't meaningfully changing the cooking time

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago

It's not lying if they have no idea what they're talking about and constantly swoon over it.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 22 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I see a lot of useless people creating a ton of busy work that just becomes an unbearable workload for the people under them. Working in manufacturing environments which (you aren't gonna believe this) are all horrifically understaffed is bad enough. Now i get to watch good workers get buried under Solvace/Fabriq/etc checklists and Leading2Lean/PerformOEE/etc task lists and spreadsheets and meetings to discuss kpis and metrics.

I need a new line of work

[–] filcuk@feddit.uk 1 points 12 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago)

Well I wouldn't recommend data & analytics right now, if you treasure your sanity.
Imagine tech debt accumulated over decades absolutely skyrocketing because LLM can generate thousands of lines of SQL or Python that noone understands.

I mean, I'm sure the same applies to all tech sectors and likely worse. I do admit it also helps us fix and uncover some old and buried bugs. It's just not used with any sort of care or long term plan.

[–] ladybugs@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Hate to day it, but every industry has turned into that. At least in my anecdotal experience and my network’s anecdotal experience, useless people using AI to create shit that means extra work for others is happening everywhere. Not saying you should stay in manufacturing if you hate it, but just be aware that you probably won’t be leaving that issue behind.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, right. My boss gave me a bunch of risk assessments to read through and let slip that AI had 'helped' produce them. So I said I'd get AI to summarise them. All this vast computing power and climate damage is being used for bullshit.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 29 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What has AI changed so far?

  • Hardware prices are so far up that nobody can buy good hardware anymore
  • we have AI child porn now, awesome
  • we have AI undressing apps, cool
  • we have AI, the great cheat tool now † we have AI, the confidently wrong 20% of the time tool
  • we have AI, the great misinformation tool
  • we are at the brink of the largest economic collapse in human history caused again by the rich loving to play Russian roulette
  • there are a limited amount of actual useful applications as well, yay

And all it cost us were millions of jobs, thousands of psychosis and deaths, hundreds of new loud polluting data centers, untold amounts of co2 when were right smack in the mids of a climate crisis...

I'm not advocating for murdering the AI CEOs, but I'm definitely a fan of at least permanent tarring and feathering

[–] amelia@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
  • two of my friends finally have diagnoses for their health problems they had been living with for decades, and can now get appropriate treatment
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Trust me, bro!

They are real people these friends of mine, but you don't know them, because they are from a different school. And you won't see them this summer at all because... they are both actually models in Canada during the summer.

But totally cured and now they get boners also with THIS ONE TRICK that doctors HATE it!!!

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 hours ago

Well, he hasn't been describing our future for at least two decades. /sarcasm

AI is changing everything... Mostly to bad, that's the part they keep.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

But it IS changing everything, and not in a good way

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

It's changing a lot of things, but many of them in only relatively minor ways. It's not affecting e.g. food supply systems in a significant way - it might be screwing up the management structures of companies involved, but that will be repairable fairly quickly..

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 hours ago

It's a self-fulfilling prophecy: if all the corporate leaders believe it will change everything and, in a fit of FOMO, force it into every corner of our lives, then everything will be changed. But not so much because of what AI can do, as because of a mass delusion among the LinkedIn types.

[–] eah@programming.dev 69 points 10 hours ago (6 children)

In other words, corporate leadership is starting from the premise that AI has (or will) radically change the business, and they're working backwards from that premise to find the evidence to support this article of faith.

Sounds familiar. The proof-of-work blockchain scheme which was the fad a while ago is also often described as a solution in search of a problem.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm glad you specifically pointed out proof-of-work blockchains.
They're very inefficient (economically and ecologically) by design. In almost all cases this design isn't warranted.
Alas there are other designs and while most of them are rubbish as well, a few ones are doing things quite right.

I hope that just like other schemes than proof-of-work were thought of regarding blockchains, there will be AI models that are way, way more efficient and ideally can be run locally - for those cases that can use AI...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FerrisEuler@programming.dev 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

This moment in history is a lot like when power tools were first invented. The bad news is corporate leaders seem to view AI as a means to downsize people. The good news is that AI lets many people who formerly lacked the ability to do anything on their own to move on the "I wish I could do ____. but _____" ideas in their head. It could be anything. You can run a competent local AI model in LM Studio with a $1000 gaming PC or you can pay $20 a month to run a frontier-quality open weights model without the usage limits of the big names. The free AIs can help you get started on doing that. Big companies are using AI for a lot of stupid crap that they try to make sound very profound. They assume customer service and quality assurance are no longer "a thing". This era reminds me of the 1970s when Bill Gates and Steve Jobs had their opening. Sometimes the big guys get sloppy. We're at that point right now. Enshittification is everywhere.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

never seen it helpful to anyone, except for the people wanting to do the layoffs. most of the time it gives misinformation to people looking for abstract-to-reality ideas.

[–] FerrisEuler@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I mean its use as a tool, maybe in a small business context. The individual can be the "visionary" giving their idea for a book to a de-facto ghost writer. AI's will often give you back info that confirms your ideas, so its like any other tool. If I am not good with a hammer then I smash my fingers and if I'm not good with AI then I convince myself the earth is actually flat.

[–] RyanDownyJr@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The recent Bank of England report indicates that, yes, small businesses are seeing the biggest benefit of the tool (AI agents), but they are not spending big dollars on it. Free models and/or entry accounts are more than enough per their survey.

I agree, its a tool. I have used free models for the last few weeks to make python scripts into portable exes to help streamline some onsite job activities that normally are done multiple times a month. I never would have the time to research how to code python, figure out libraries and such to put together, and then compile all that into an exe. You'll never see me spend money on AI when the free models work well enough not needing "frontier" features.

[–] Reality@feddit.org 4 points 2 hours ago

The funny thing to me is that Lemmy users seem to be so staunchly against LLMs, that they are unable to even acknowledge the small things it truly is good for as a tool. It's like the opposite of hackernews on here.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

A more recent (and maybe closer) analogy is the advent of ebook readers and the heralding of the Death Of The Book. I suspect we'll be in a similar place in a few years - books stores are doing just fine, perhaps even better than pre-ebook.

load more comments
view more: next ›