this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
793 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

87214 readers
3405 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

But Margaret have dog, can't be mad...

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

But the grid can’t handle EV or the “pollution” they create.

[–] darklamer@feddit.org 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Fun fact: This could possibly be true at the same time.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

While this certainly could be true, I would say it's only that way because state and federal government refuse to invest in our aging energy grid.

with proper taxation and directing that towards upgrading the infrastructure, supporting it is absolutely possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (4 children)

Remember that Stargate SG1 episode where they find themselves into a huge underground facility that is under attack by external forces. Jack O'Neill accepts to pilot one of their drones to help defend the complex from a wave of bombers and is infuriated to learn that the attacker's bombers were manned while he believed they were unmanned.

spoilerAt the end it turns out the facility was actively poisoning the entire planet, threatening to wipe out all life and the "attackers" were simply the people of the rest of the world trying to stop it.

That is what the Amazon data center is to me.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 27 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Don't tempt me to rewatch all of SG1 again >.>

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

You mean don't tempt you with a good time?

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 6 points 19 hours ago

A key thing there is that the bunker dwellers were at least eugenicists if not outright Nazi analogues and they were deliberately killing everyone outside as untermensch, it wasn't just a callous side effect of their facility.

[–] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Which episode is this, this might get me into SG1

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

The one with Odo in it!

Season 4 episode 2

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 40 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

can we use some patriot missiles for something patriotic?

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 7 points 17 hours ago

If the U.S. blew this up, I'd concede that the U.S. actually does help the world from time to time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 23 points 21 hours ago

Welcome to costco, I love you

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 15 hours ago

Ah but the never-ending deluge of Just Dance Vance videos is worth it!

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 93 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It doesn't need to be so, the asshole billionaires just don't give a single fuck about anyone but themselves. They don't even care about their kids.

[–] burido@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

What womam would want to have sex with those old pedos anyway?

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 18 points 20 hours ago

They have enough money for generations of their children to live as untouchables. They don’t need to care about their kids.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 6 points 18 hours ago

they wouldn't be able to do shit if we didn't enable them to do it; point the anger at the right place.

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 17 points 20 hours ago

Shut it down.

[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's in one of the sunniest places in the US too. 6.0 kWh/m²/day of solar irradiance. There's even already a relatively large solar farm in the same county.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 77 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Wait, it does not run on solar, even partially? JFC.

edit: yep.

Amazon has confirmed its investment in a massive gas-burning power plant in Texas, meant to supply up to 7.65 gigawatts of energy to a planned data center in Pecos County. Should it come online as planned, the plant’s 35 turbines would be allowed to spew 33 million tons of CO2 a year, the NYT notes, which would easily make it the largest single fount of emissions in the country.

It would also be in stark defiance of Amazon’s stated climate goals, which center on reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2040.

🤦

Does greed know no end in this country?

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 17 points 22 hours ago

it does know an end. in fact, the end just pled guilty to stalking ending in death in new york.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I were king they could run data centers with solar and fans. No outside power, no outside water.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

You realize they are for sifting through the massive amount of surveillance data using AI right? They aren’t for ChatGPT. They are for categorizing and watching every person on the planet 1984 style.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 29 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

that's my biggest worry, more data centers won't lower the cost of LLM tokens.

The only reason they want so much compute power is to have AI agents watching and annotating everything flock cameras see.

not just license plate readers (a raspberry pi could handle that). but everything.

My paranoia is that in 5 years, if you protest, the police will come to arrest you with a long list of every "crime" you have committed: driving holding you phone, no seatbelt, a recipt flew out of your pockets... a long list of petty meaningless violations.

and they'll have that list for everyone.

[–] morto@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago

Just imagine the number of misclassifications...

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

They are already unpopular now. Wait till the pigs dive even deeper in popularity.

They might convince the general population that the first amendment is not worth exercising, and instead we all neet to contemplate military style resistance.

Nobody apparently wants to bring trouble to themselves as long as there is still anything left to hope for. However that calculus can change once the powers that be engineer a life even more glaringly worthless than it already is. Lots of people are quiet quitting or not having children already. That trend will accelerate even further.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (5 children)

This thing is 7.65GW. The largest solar array in the US is 900MW and uses 4600-5000 acres. The scale to do this on solar alone is bonkers, but not impossible.

You would need to at least 4x provision it which means a 30GW solar array, and 156,000 acres, before getting into battery storage for non sunny times.

It'd be nice to use some solar absolutely, but this is better suited to nuclear.

Edit: And if you aren't storing / over provision to store, then you still need the peak output from another source anyway and these things likely always run near peak as they are constantly in use, so the size of the non-solar source doesn't reduce, only its output during the sunny day time hours. So you end up with 7.65GW of natural gas still, but maybe they also build a 1GW solar farm on the side.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Nuclear power run by a publicly traded company worries me.

Because there will be shareholder value vs. safety trades.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Probably shouldn't be run by them i agree, but they could fund it and go into some agreement to purchase its power.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 70 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Torch it. Torch it before its too late.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 12 hours ago

Pharaoh ants.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago

Sounds like an engineering nightmare

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I'm so glad I never procreated.

With any luck I'll croak before the worst effects of these decisions manifest.

[–] ryphez@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Weren’t they supposed to be carbon neutral by 2030? Sure seems like they’re trending the wrong way

[–] Mannimarco@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago

That was just talk

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Amazon: "but but but! we have over 50,000 electric delivery vans, and we sent Capt Kirk to space!"

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›