CeeBee_Eh

You mean arguing with people who show you're wrong? Good move.

Is 15lbs 2nd?

It's not a requirement to have all those things. Having just one is enough to meet the definition. Such as problem solving, which LLMs are capable of doing.

That's the same as arguing "life" is conscious, even though most life isn't conscious or sapient.

Some day there could be AI that's conscious, and when it happens we will call that AI conscious. That still doesn't make all other AI conscious.

It's such a weirdly binary viewpoint.

Ok. I won't.

No, it's because it isn't conscious. An LLM is a static model (all our AI models are in fact). For something to be conscious or sapient it would require a neural net that can morph and adapt in real-time. Nothing currently can do that. Training and inference are completely separate modes. A real AGI would have to have the training and inference steps occurring at once and continuously.

Education was always garbage though. It is designed to generate obidient wage slaves.

in the US

Fixed that for you

You have that backwards. People are using the colloquial definition of AI.

"Intelligence" is defined by a group of things like pattern recognition, ability to use tools, problem solving, etc. If one of those definitions are met then the thing in question can be said to have intelligence.

A flat worm has intelligence, just very little of it. An object detection model has intelligence (pattern recognition) just not a lot of it. An LLM has more intelligence than a basic object detection model, but still far less than a human.

You might want to look up the definition of intelligence then.

By literal definition, a flat worm has intelligence. It just didn't have much of it. You're using the colloquial definition of intelligence, which uses human intelligence as a baseline.

I'll leave this graphic here to help you visualize what I mean:

That's why they're calling it "AI".

That's not why. They're calling it AI because it is AI. AI doesn't mean sapient or conscious.

Edit: look at this diagram if you're still unsure:

Torvalds be with you. Go in peace.

Sorry for trying to improve everyone's lives. How selfish of us to share superior technology.

I guess we'll just hoard all the good stuff and not let you guys have any of it from now on.