this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
1043 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

87348 readers
3849 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 40 points 3 days ago (9 children)

You shouldn't trust billionaires at all. Even the "good ones". You don't get a billion net worth without exploiting people

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

"Young people increasingly don't appear to be incredibly dumb, survey finds."

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 40 points 3 days ago (19 children)

I don’t trust anyone who is impressed by LLMs enough to consider them to be in any way adjacent to intelligence.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You are absolutely right! Should I create a list of people who you should not trust?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 84 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm so blackpilled on the average person. These stats mean nothing because the average person not trusting a tech company does absolutely nothing to push them away from it. 80% distrust AI but 50% use it and the stat is growing.

[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Indeed. The average person seems to need instagram, whatsapp and xitter to fill their meaningless little isolated lives with distractions to feel... something. However on a more positive note, once people get suspicious about AI slop they tend to notice the slop patterns more easily, which is a good development. It's something that can't be unseen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 12 points 3 days ago

billionaires tell people to love the thing they are trying to get them hooked on so that they can run a rampant monopoly and make some more billions.

If you remove yourself from the equation maybe there is some chance. So if you really love AI, perhaps fuck off.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 103 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Maybe the kids are gonna be alright, after all.

[–] tangeli@piefed.social 64 points 4 days ago (4 children)

AI is just one of several serious existential threats the kids will have to deal with. They're far from alright.

[–] iknewitwhenisawit@fedinsfw.app 47 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"The kids are alright" does not mean that the world where the kids live is alright, it means that the kids are alright. 😅

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

We got THIS close to being done with nicotine and bullshit in the air in daily life, and then the kids discovered vaping.

At best, the kids are in the aggregate no better or worse than the generations before them. No generation is going to save us from stupid when stupid is part of our species' DNA.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Bro. The kids are alright. Not pristine perfect beings who will being about a new era of prosperity.

Besides, why you putting it on "the kids discovered vaping"? That sounds like something a billionaire would say to deflect from the huge lobbying campaign they made to distinguish vapes from cigarettes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] kepix@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

my experience, that all my collegues who are aroubd 28-35, use a shitload of ai. younger generation is now using it instead of google search.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's because they fucked the google search so that ai is the only thing that gives you what you're looking for. Eventually. After you've argued with it.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

At least google's ai will list the sources it's allegedly drawing from so you can verify it's hallucinations live.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 42 points 4 days ago (22 children)

As an old person I can also say that old people don't trust AI, or the leaders of those companies, or the current administration...

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

It's almost like it doesn't matter what plebs think and we've known this for a long time.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I don't just think AI should be regulated, I think everyone at the hyperscaler companies should be criminally indicted. Every employee at OpenAI and Anthropic working on AI development should be indicted on 8 million counts of child endangerment.

The relevant statute is California 273a.

It is a crime in the state of California to allow a child to be placed in a position where great harm could come to them. For example, people have been indicted under this statute because they had drugs in the same house as young children. Even if no children are actually hurt, simply putting them in a situation where harm is likely is the crime.

It would normally be quite difficult to prove that the actions of OpenAI and others are endangering children. But the very words of these companies would be the first exhibit of the prosecution. They've openly confessed to their crimes! These very same companies and their leaders have repeatedly said that they're building machines that they themselves believe have a reasonable chance of destroying humanity. And the children of California are a subset of humanity.

Whether their claims are realistic or not, I cannot say. But I simply cannot believe that it is legal to build a machine that you yourself believe could destroy the world. We're so glazed over by the novelty of AI that we forget to treat it like any other threat. In most places it is a crime to perform some action that you believe has a realistic chance of hurting people, even if you have no intention or desire to hurt people.

Well, according to OpenAI, the machines they are building represent a very real risk to the life and safety of every child in the State of California. I see no reason that they shouldn't be charged with millions of counts of child endangerment. According to their own words, they are literally putting the lives of children at risk. That is a crime. That is not legal. And we should stop pretending it is.

[–] Lojcs@piefed.social 20 points 4 days ago (3 children)

If this argument worked fossil fuel companies wouldn't exist

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean, the marketing people should have been able to tell management that too.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 18 points 3 days ago

Never underestimate me how out of touch business management can be.

There's a saying- corporate consultants are people who charge millions to tell you what your employees and customers have been trying to tell you for free.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Trust the parasite class! I mean, what could possibly go wrong, right..?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago

Good. Young people are hip to what's going on and that is uplifting.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Most everything I do is local but I don’t trust AI anymore than I trust any other tool. If it gives code that works or instructions to do what I need great. Even when it’s wrong I’m learning something new.

I totally agree about the billionaires. I absolutely don’t trust these dickheads running the shit show… Sam Altman, Jensen Huang, Elon Musk, Dario Amodei, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison… Fuck everyone of these guys. Everyone of them is a rich asshole trying to scheme as much as they can out of the system. I think their end goal is to put people out of work so they can automate as much as possible so they don’t rely on anything else. If AGI or superintelligence arrives within the decade, whoever controls it controls the economy that follows. It will be such a game changer nobody is even close to prepared for it.

Go read “I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream” by Harlan Ellison, Hyperion by Dan Simmons, Colossus by D.F. Jones, or maybe Accelerando by Charles Stross. None of these end well.

[–] BigBoyShuanzee@aussie.zone 7 points 3 days ago (8 children)

I've been in IT since 2007 I've been with computers since 1994 with a second hand MS DOS.

AI is 100 very good for scientists and people in the medical industry (I don't know why, but I know they've all told me it's good for them). Outside of the above.. Everything else about AI is pointless.. It's just googling things slightly faster than I can google things.

[–] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Interestingly, in the medical field, I have seen a few headlines, but, I was talking to a guy who works for Mayo Clinic. His job is literally trying to quantify the effects AI is having with the doctors, and talking with him I said the same thing “at least it’s good for the medical field” and he replied with “who told you that? I would actually love to speak with them.” So, I’m not sure how effective it is in the medical field either.

[–] BigBoyShuanzee@aussie.zone 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Very interesting, I work in IT and talked about how useless AI is and I got told off by multiple "scientists" because AI was revolutionising the way they did their research.

Granted this was on Reddit so maybe just people wanting to argue.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

AI is not making my life easier. My gas is not cheaper. Food is still the 2nd highest spend behind housing. Its just not a thing that people with grass to mow need beyond maybe a better search engine.

[–] UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

With ai hallucinations..Ai fakery and the topmost reason being layoffs being attributed increasingly to AI...I don't think so there's anything much to love about AIs. When billionaires tell the society to love something... it's because there's 10000% profit for them in that and almost none for us masses.

[–] DeepRoots@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Solrac@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Nah, why would anyone love AI when we can just--

Let's all love Lain!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 4 days ago

there you go! keep using that noggin!

load more comments
view more: next ›