this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
339 points (99.4% liked)

memes

22375 readers
2840 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChaosMonkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago
[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

100x productivity boost? Then you must be working much less, and still making much more, right? Doesn't even need to reach that 100x figure, even say half the work hours and 2-3x the pay or 1/4 the work hours for the same pay would be great.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

Or getting paid more?

Oh... Just exploited more. Got it.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

How do they even measure productivity? The line of code output?

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Depends on where you work. That's one potential measure. It's a shitty one though.

[–] plateee@piefed.social 14 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Yes, you'll be working less because we're replacing your team with AI

-management

One bill later from AWS...

Why is everything so expensive!

-still management

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

Based on my AI enthusiast colleagues, I totally believe 100x productive.

100 x 0 == 0

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 5 points 19 hours ago

"No Padme. I will be out of the job and fill repositories with my vibe coded slop free of charge."

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 5 points 19 hours ago

I now start and abandon x10 more hobby projects every year, so yeah, my productivity is definitely up.

[–] grandel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

Neither is the case

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Generally people choose to work the same hours even when their productivity goes up because the opportunity cost of not working an hour goes up too

[–] obelisk_complex@piefed.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

I think you've just summed the problem very elegantly. Well done.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Me, being 100x more productive

Increasing spam phone calls by 100x

[–] makeshift0546@lemmy.today 2 points 20 hours ago

I work less these days with a bump of productivity and I'll be getting a sizable bump in salary eoy🤷‍♂️

Win win in my situation for the moment.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 21 hours ago

100x, in much the same way that a team of 100 interns will. AI useful but lacking context.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I output more personalized smut mods than anyone ever thought possible

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Trailblazer here!

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If the original phrase was true and the market for software was saturated, the point would be that more productive people would outcompete you out of your job. The correct answer is to either get the most productivity possible so you'll end up a little richer, or switch careers.

But both the original phrase is a lie and the market for software is nowhere close saturation.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The market for regular food was completely saturated before fast food and highly processed food entered that market. The shittiest chefs weren't outcompeted by the best chefs. The market for regular food shrank a little perhaps, but the total market might have tripled in size. No one had expected back then that a) people would get this fat on average and b) that there would be this many people alive. I agree with your conclusion but it's naive to believe you see the future because you understand the past.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fair, I thought touching grass was teh whole point