this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
123 points (95.6% liked)

Games

50331 readers
772 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Dremor@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
Dremor@jlai.lu
PerfectDark@lemmy.world
123
'Who’s Deciding The Fate Of This Game?' The Secretive Process Of Getting A Game With Sexual Content On Steam (aftermath.site)
submitted 1 day ago by kip5608@retrolemmy.com to c/games@lemmy.world
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I personally always find it weird that killing hundreds of people is okay but nudity requires scrutiny.

That being said this derives from stripe threatening Valve in the near past (which is why their previous games didn't face this scrutiny). This is a known thing that any game developer, especially one developing mature content, should know. And the content in that game is definitely mature, if the screenshots of the game were shared without context I would think it's one of those sex simulators, which I get this is not and those are just small parts of the bigger picture of the game, but that's just like saying "this chocolate bar shouldn't need to be classified as containing peanuts, it only has 1 peanut".

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

I honestly think its because, as per every cheesy plot in the history of ever, love beats hate.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 37 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

I personally always find it weird that killing hundreds of people is okay but nudity requires scrutiny.

Just Christian moral panic and puritanism, which has fucked us up mentally and psychologically for centuries now.

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

It's much easier to have power over people who can be blackmailed for "sexual deviance" when the definition is very broad, can be tracked online, and tracking and banning are voluntarily enforced by corporate entities like banks (no-free speech problems).

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Rather than put us against invented enemies, I like to think a lot of Christians actually don’t care much about these subjects, and that the push specifically comes from Christofascism (rich people without a soul in their body using religion as a weapon to restrict and control people)

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

That's a bingo!

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Which is weird because "thou shall not kill" comes before adultery in the commandments, and go forth and procreate is also somewhere in that book.

[–] Keegen@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty certain that about 80% of people who consider themselves "Christians" couldn't even list all of the ten commandments if you asked them.

[–] cosmos8188@leminal.space 1 points 11 hours ago

Agreed they dont even follow the rules - unless by rules you mean their rules.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't say it made sense.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Almost makes you think that the bible might have been written by humans and is just as flawed in its text as humanity itself.

[–] Nelots@piefed.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

While that's very much true, that's not really what I take away from it. The bible could be 100% true and this wouldn't really change anything in this particular case.

What it instead tells me is that people will pick out whichever parts of the bible suit their biases and follow them, all so they can feel good about themselves despite ignoring the half of it they don't like. I also don't see many Christians avoiding mixed fabrics despite their god supposedly saying that's a no-no two different times.

[–] makeitwonderful@lemmy.today 0 points 11 hours ago

There's a lot of killing in the bible as well. Moses and Joshua committed genocides sanctioned by the Christian god. I can see how people who hold the bible in high regard could be motivated to downplay the horror of murder.

[–] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the problematic content isn't crucial part of the game, they can try to go for the "official 18+ patch" like some VN re-releases, which would be like adding a peanut in a separate box

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

Absolutely, have the game without it and a free (or with a stupid price like 10 cents just to ensure legal age requirements) DLC that's parked as adult only. But I think in this case it might be too engrained to the core of what the game is, that they can't, and if that's the case it makes sense to mark the entire game as adult IMO

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile, there are "all-ages" anime visual-novel games on steam with official patches hosted by the developers off-site which turn them into full-on pornos - which is the version of the game they are actually trying to sell and what people are buying it for.

And not a peep from Valve on that because it's off-site.

Must be very frustrating to developers of mainline games that by being honest and engaging with valve openly, they face far more hassle than groups who designed their game specifically to circumvent the rules.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Steam is OK with porn games. Banks are not. Banks have the power. Steam has to not get debanked.

I fully expect to have to download a patch from the dev when buying a porn game because of the censorship. If its not on Steam or a few other trusted platforms I won't bother paying.

The user adding the "optional" content after purchase make it not Steams problem while getting past bank censorship.

[–] arules@retrofed.com 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Then why isn't Valve a Bank⸮

[–] CalemitousVariantK@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

They probably have more cash money than a lot of banks who haven't fully marked the value of their assets to market value since about 2008. I don't actually have a list of who's who, but creative accounting has been an open secret for some time and will likely become fashionable again either this year or next. Unless someone wants a banking crash or (more likely) is just too stupid to hire anyone that can stop one.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I'm only remarking on the irony that porn developers might have an easier time because they can intentionally develop the clean 'steam-version' of their game to pass review without having to declare any contents at all.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Stupid question - since I have adult mode turned on in Steam, I get weird hentai games like "Slut Goblin" and "Big Tiddy Blackjack".

I'm guessing the games they're promoting are not adult games, but include sex, which is what's causing a issue? They want their game to not be behind that setting?

Is it possible to create a Adult mod or "Directors Mod" to bypass it? Something that a player can choose to get it if they want the more explicit scenes?

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it makes it a double edged sword. Why can Cyberpunk, which has a ton of sexual content, be a front page game while this, which is far more tame need to be locked behind the adult section?

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 22 hours ago

Because the latter doesn't have a massive team of lawyers available to sue over it.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 10 points 23 hours ago

Unless your game actually has adult content (and lots of it!) you don't want it hiding behind some adults-only flag where few people will see it.

Basically a death sentence for your game.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

The issue is that they don't want the game to be flagged:

If the game remains flagged this way, it will “have very serious implications on its accessibility and visibility,” says Pedercini.

[–] lizardo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It’s shocking that a commercial game developer didn’t consider this possibility at all. The article’s complaints about capitalism and the identity of the artist feel more like trapped in a box instead of thinking.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

They probably thought since it's nowhere near the level of some games that were allowed to go without the tag, they probably didn't need to worry about it.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They should've sold the game on JAST or DLSite. They find sexual content to be perfectly satisfactory.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

it's about market access.

you wouldn't make a product and go sell it at the local bait shop, you would try to sell it through Walmart for maximum market saturation.

everyone who you want to sell a game to has a steam account, but only 40-70% of them have JAST or DLSite access.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If Walmart hates you and won't let you sell with them, then you had might as well sell at a local shop anyway to get some return on investment, yeah?