this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
405 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

88825 readers
3437 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 32 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Nevrr forget, Accenture used to be Arthur Anderson, of Enron infamy. They deserve any financial ruin they get, IMO.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago

Sheeit thanks for the reminder (and trip down memory lane)

Fuck AA

[–] abc@suppo.fi -4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Accenture is a technology consulting company. Nobody needs technology consultants with AIs around, because AIs are more capable, much faster, and much cheaper than almost all consultants. Their standard hourly rates are typically in the same ballpark as AIs' highest subscription monthly rates.

Therefore, as their sales start drying up, Accenture is starting to save money wherever it can before it needs to start firing people.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

In my company some of the top users spend over $3000/m. $29 is maybe 30 mins - 1 hour continuous running for a *medium" sized model like Sonnet. Not sure about cheaper models.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 17 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I spent $200 in one session the other day, watching the clanker design, implement, and review the change. Still have no idea what I did but my name is on the commit

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 28 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] chocrates@piefed.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I hate it of course. I need to find an exit strategy

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 6 hours ago

Don't pay the bill. They'll force you to quit before long.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 4 points 12 hours ago

Fair point, but not any less fulfilling than my day job already was, arguably maybe a little more fun to be spending the company's money on nonsense. My job pays my bills very adequately, that's normally the only fulfilling thing about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 0 points 11 hours ago

Interesting. Yeah, me and my coworkers spend about $1000 per month—so far. The bill keeps going up. One AI workshop thing they made us do spent $100 just in 1 session.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That's basically saying that they shouldn't use Claude at all.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I'm willing to bet that only a fraction of that spend was work task related.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 31 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

If my productivity (and therefore my job) were measured not by results but by amount of tokens I use, you can bet I'm gonna burn tokens for absolutely everything during my work shift. Even if it's just asking the chatbot what time is it every second.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 14 hours ago
[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 5 points 14 hours ago

The $29 cap signals that per-seat AI budgets cannot yet cover agentic coding tools, which cost heavy users anywhere from $500 to $1,000 a month.

It may be so, but that tells me even if they wanted to use it for productive work, it'd still cost them about that much.

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 5 points 13 hours ago

Silly Accenture, that's not the way to tokenmaxx.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Well duh? I doubt $29 get you anywhere at the moment and that nonsense is only going to get more expensive.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 13 hours ago

For now, that's not crazy. I have a company-provided api key and subscription. Now maybe they bumped me to the a $100/mo tier without telling me, but as far as I know the lowest tier keeps me in tokens heat about all month and I use it a lot. I switch over to API for a few hours per month and probably spend more in that time than my sub costs all month.

I spent about $2k developing a set of tools and AI orchestrates them for me, and I can add new tools to orchestrate as needed. Caveat: I do more production support and my teams do the production development work. We are all on subscription plans, but they do more hand development than I do.

Point being, you can easily spend >$1k/mo and me and several people on my teams did before we got subscriptions, but the subs give some AI assistance without going all-in on AI coding, which is the sweet spot IMO.

[–] PetteriPano@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

$29 is enough for one of them pro plans. That's plenty if you're not wasteful.

But do companies like Accenture get that subsidized plan at scale? At API rates that can easily be thousands of dollars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

The free tier might actually give more usage

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

o.O my budget can be requested up to $2k/month.

$29/month is like... not using it lol

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk -1 points 12 hours ago

It goes back to being a tool, not just the method. Still quite productive.

[–] Scrogu@lemmy.zip -1 points 11 hours ago

Amateurs.

I'm spending 4000$ per month.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›