this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
647 points (96.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39933 readers
3761 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll take 0,01 if it ensures that the person who dies is a billionaire

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

The more often you'd press it, the higher your chances! Good luck, we're counting on you!

[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

That sums up the IQ of Mrbeast fanbase right there, peak irony.

[–] Alandrus_Sun@ttrpg.network 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'd press it at least 500 times. Maybe more, you need to make sure it works and one random death isn't going to make the news. So gotta put in work and press it as many times in one instance. And, I get paid at the end?

Every time I pet my cat, a random stranger somewhere in the world dies. There's 8 billion people in the world, at least a few hundred are born and die every minute.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago

The bourgeoisie already does that offer, the proletariat can't choose it.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You pay taxes in the US, you've already paid for the random death of people.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

paid, not been paid - that's a difference, and also not voluntarily. Arguably, those who don't pay taxes (i.e. took many times 10000) are causing the deaths of millions by their lobbying to become richer.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you are a U.S. corporation who doesn't pay taxes you've already been paid billion$ for the death of hundreds of random people all across the globe.

Better?

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (7 children)

This is an old twilight zone episode. A women is given a box with one button on it and told to press it is she wants the money, but someone she doesn’t even know will die.

She decides the push the button, and then someone comes to collect the button device, saying that it will now be reset and taken to someone else now for the same challenge. Some random person on earth. Implying that she will be the next to die if the button gets pushed.

Frankly not a bad system. Slowly cleanses the selfish from the earth.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm an 80s kid but I skipped the old Twilight episodes ... so I'm trying to darnest to catch up on them and I'm learning how awesome the ideas were even if the presentation is dated.

Just a random segue ...

I sound naive but I didn't realize that Rod Sterling wanted to tell stories about social issues -- racism and stuff but the networks wouldn't let him. If he wanted to tell a story about an alien or an invader then the networks would let it pass through. So it was a way for him to tell harder stories to the general public.

I think that's a lot of sci-fi like Invasion of the Body Snatcher and such but I just never thought about it deeply enough.

There's the treehouse of horror episode by the Simpsons where Bart is omnipotent and I knew it was based on something but I only recently learned it from: "It's a Good Life" which is a book and a Twilight Zone episode. I only watched the parody up until this year and I just thought it was a fun concept. Then I watched the original and a breakdown and it was a take on totalitarian regimes.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah some of them are little moral parables and some are just setups for a thrill/shock twist.

This “button” episode was actually from the 80s reboot of TZ, not the Rod Serling original.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 12 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Was the lady told what would happen if she pressed the button?

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Yes it was clear that someone somewhere in the world “who you don’t even know” would die. The characters have a debate:

“Maybe it’ll be just some Chinese peasant.”

“What if it’s someone’s newborn baby!”

More than anything I’m shocked at the casual dismissal of the Chinese peasant. WTF?

Anyway at the very end of the show the same guy who brought them this dilemma comes to collect the device and he very pointedly uses the same language to say “now it will go to someone new that you don’t even know.”

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Button,_Button_(The_Twilight_Zone)

Yes, that somewhere in the world, someone she doesnt know will die.

When Mr. Steward returns to collect the button box after the button is pressed, the lady asks what happens to the box next. She is told it will go to someone else with the same offer, with assurances that the new recipient will not know who she is. As the previous commenter said, the wording deeply implies she would be the certain "someone" targeted by the next button press.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

She got $20,000 if I'm not mistaken. In '80s money.

Also it was originally meant to kill her husband. They changed it for the show.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

$200,000 - which if you consider that it was 1980s money, makes Mr. Beast’s $10,000 look very small.

By “originally meant to” I think you are referring to the short story it was based on ending that way.

A despondent Norma asks the stranger why her husband was the one who was killed. The stranger replies, "Do you really think you knew your husband?" strongly disapproved of the Twilight Zone version, especially the new ending

Frankly I find the twilight zone ending more chilling and suspenseful. The “do you think you really knew your husband” line is kinda sad trombone.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I really liked the line in the Twilight Zone when she asked who it would b given to next, "I can assure you it will be offered to someone whom you don't know." Pretty chilling IYAM

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The ultra rich:

I'd do it for $10!

[–] AuginTuga34@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'd do that for a dollar!

[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We learned during Covid that at least half of the country would kill not some stranger, but their neighbors and friends, and not for ten grand, but to avoid the mild discomfort of wearing a mask and social distancing

[–] theboomr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Still happening too

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

many of them were willing to kill their own children, and even themselves, to briefly avoid that mild discomfort

[–] 42firehawk@fedinsfw.app 1 points 1 day ago

I mean, 3.6 million is a bit more money tbh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works 73 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

About 2 people are dying every second regardless, so if i don't take the money, 2 people die.

Im actually saving a life by briefly capping the death rare at 1.

[–] petersr@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Sorry, but that's not how it works. 3 people die that instant.

[–] imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'll stick with the original scenario and gratefully receive $10,000 for saving a life.

But thank you for your new offer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] remon@ani.social 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I would think you random death would just be added to the baseline.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

No.

Also, fuck Mr. Beast. A billionaire proposing yet another Trolley Problem for amusement and engagement bait.

That is happening everyday, done by thousands of people who could have stopped those deaths readily. Just they are obsessed with more wealth.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Jokes aside, no. I don't think I'd do it for $100 million. I seriously don't.

The justifications y'all are providing don't work for me. Maybe it's because I have a son, and I can imagine he would be the one to die, then I remember everyone is the child of someone, or the friend, etc.

I will not be the knowing cause of the death of some random person just for money. You guys can have it. No, thank you.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] remon@ani.social 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 32 points 2 days ago

-- every billionaire in the world

[–] bequirtle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

if anyone presses the button and I die I'm haunting your stupid ass forever

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

remember that cring video he did with KSI, its like they were in cave in afghanistan, and he had a gun to the guests head to force them to eat his lunchly.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No.

Counter proposition: for every €10 I pay, a random fascist dies. I'm willing to spend all my money, and am willing to take gifts from others to continue paying more amounts of €10 for as long as I have any. I'll even spend €100 to prioritize highly influential fascists first.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

It's a life, how much could it cost. $10,000?

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yes. In fact I'll keep at it until Mr Beast is the one who drops dead. It's not about the money, but the principle of the thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›