this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
424 points (96.5% liked)

Linux

66789 readers
613 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/hardware/p/2144337/commodore-announces-linux-based-flip-phone-with-no-social-media-no-browser-the-callback

Linux-based phone still ‘runs 99% of Android apps’ so you can do more with it, if you wish.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wrongdoer2@sh.itjust.works 140 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Great initiative but at this price it's just a scam srlsy..

[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 78 points 1 month ago (3 children)

MediaTek Helio G81 SoC, with 4GB/64GB

Uhhh. For $500? Sorry, no.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

I mean its a small company. We have become too used to subsidized costs at the sake of our privacy. Know why TVs are now $200? They are literal spyware in the home. Try buying one without spyware, $999 real fast for the same TV.

Know why phone companies give you a "free" $1000 phone? Youre the product. Constantly tracked and sold. A digital slave.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Pinephone was a fraction of that price. Can't you run PostmarketOS on a Fair phone too? But that has much better specs.

[–] OccasionallyFeralya@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The pinephone was atrocious (As a daily) though. From what I’ve heard from owners it still struggles to this day to run basic mobile Linux OSes.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Fact. It's amazing that it exists, but it is definitely not a daily driver device. At least for me.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Uhh the pinephone in general sucks for daily use . its a tinker phone

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Phone companies dont give you a "free" $1000 phone, you're actually paying more for it via the monthly bill payments.

That's on top of you being the product as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Look, I love the idea of a Linux phone.

But $500 and it manages my temptations for me? Fuck no.

The whole point of Linux is freedom.

Enough behavior shaping.

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

Yeh right, i already don't use social media on my phone, skill issue

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How does it not have social media or browser if so many apps are compatible? Doesn’t that amount of compatibility mean we can still have social media and browsers?

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Based on the article, they have a blocklist of certain apps. You can only install apps they allow. Not sure how extensive the list is, but surely the most popular ones are blocked and they will probably update the list.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I interpret it as "We do not install bloatware such as Facebook etc. by default".

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The fact that Android vendors do this is annoying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stupendous@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

It's like that era of putting pink ribbons on everything for breast cancer that also signaled you were a supporter of women. Commercialized activism. Be real. This will sell very little. We'll get some news articles about how it's trending with Gen z that are rejecting technology and always online culture. It'll actually only be a small amount of Gen z but you know blogspam going to blogspam.

It's a crappy product. We need a Linux phone that would actually be a halo product for people to not feel like they're ripping themselves off to get away from Google and Apple

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They lost me at $499. A phone that is just a phone should be about a hundred bucks max. I didn't read the article though. Maybe it's still very computery.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Small production run + half-decent internals probably accounts for a lot of the price.

Having experimented with $100 underpowered flip phone on KaiOS, lack of apps was a real problem. What (some) people want is the slight inconvenience of a T9 keyboard and an annoyingly small screen to help them limit their screen time, but they still want full functionality of all their apps.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Geodes_n_Gems@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 month ago

That's a stupid price, one of the main things of brick/flip phones is their low price, HMD feature phones range from about £20 to £70, some new google pixels can go for about this price, so getting something with the price of a smartphone with a fraction of the features sounds scummy.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My first thought was, this might be about just what's installed by default. Reading a bit further the article says:

Apparently, the OS has hard blocks to stop the installation of browsers and social media apps.

"Users are still able to sideload apps outside those that are blocked, using APK installer files..."

So I'm not sure why I would want pay 500 Dollars / Euros, just so they have control over what I can install and not. To me this would be a deal breaker. Also this seems to be "basically a custom version of the Jolla Sailfish OS", so there are probably "better" options using the same OS. And it only has 4GB of RAM? I am not impressed for the price and for the control.

[–] Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Browser and email is the bare minimum, though.

Even the cheapest clamshells in the 2000s had those two.

Don't preinstall it by default if you want to look minimal but being forced to sideload (their app store blocks this essential category?????) an Android APK in the emulator instead of using native Linux apps for that, is ridiculous

I understand that for a small company like them (it's being owned by a YouTuber now) creating hardware is extremely expensive and 499 can even considered cheap with all the custom stuff in this device, plastic molds, dedicated assembly lines and so on, but my mind can't accept paying more than 149 for something like this

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] yumyumsmuncher@feddit.uk 22 points 1 month ago

$499? No thanks

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So happy with my 2nd hand Pixel 8. No BS, ecologically acceptable IMHO and yes runs most Android apps thanks to GrapheneOS.

[–] GMac@feddit.org 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Whatsapp preinstalled... hard pass from me. All the other considerations like price, browser block, app emulation implementation; those are all things I could probably get past but preinstalled spyware is unacceptable from the get go.

Edit to add. The app blocking is interesting to me. Instead of thinking about the user being blocked from unstalling and using the app, I'm curious about the technology they will use to block the app (and app maker) from running activity on the device.

Hopefully the solution includes something like DNS blocking rather than a blacklist on the play integrity api and a reliance on Google killing the unstall of apk from other sources.

Not sure if DNS blocking explains the browser exclusion which is otherwise a bit odd.

[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

This phone is probably aimed at countries where Whatsapp is legit mandatory if you want a social life and a job (e.g. much of Europe and South America)

[–] dawcas@scribe.disroot.org 8 points 1 month ago

I'm from Spain and don't have Watsapp nor a smartphone. Coincidentally I also lack a social life.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BartyDeCanter@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While it seems like everyone here hates it, I’ve been looking for a minimal phone for when my current one dies. This seems to hit the exact sweet spot of functionality I want vs what I don’t want. As for the price, well, I’m spending at least that much on my next phone anyway so it seems fine by me.

And I have a huge nostalgia for flip phones and transparent electronics. So yeah, signed up to preorder.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who is going to pay $500 for a retro flip phone, when you can get a second-hand iPhone for half that? Or you know, an actual flip phone for $25.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

At $200... Maybe.

AI slop video, no faith in what will (or likely won't) be delivered.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] droniecarp@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago

Zero justification for that price tag.

[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

499? hahahhaa

[–] original_reader@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

500 dollars!? What's the justification for that price?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, another company trying to squeeze ridiculous amounts of money out of people just because "it has linux".

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Commodore? C64 and Amiga Commodore? Well, it seems to be a new startup that simply bought and revived the trademark. Instead of a $500 paperweight, they should instead focus on affordable, Linux-based PCs and laptop. Perhaps they could build their own distro using an Amiga-esque filesystem. I would definitely daily-drive a Commodore-branded laptop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 month ago

no social media, no browser
marketing material: social media in a glorified browser

[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

500$? and they used to make one of the cheapest computers on the market

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

That's easy too expensive for a phone with bad specs that just has blocked access to certain apps

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

Sounds great for kids. The price point can suck a dick tho

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (6 children)

the "official reveal trailer" is done with ai, it looks like a scam

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] morto@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I don't get that "minimalist phone" market I can just get an older phone, remove all social media and use it

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (5 children)

You can't remove lot of apps in most Android phones. I have an older phone S7 Edge which I installed an alternative Android OS called "/e/OS". Its way more private by default. Besides all the benefits of privacy, I also do not use the Google Play Store and do not have any social media on it installed.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›