With many critical apps still running on Windows only, Windows needs to get worse!
To push those software companies over to embrace Linux finally. Then the users can follow.
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
334 points (93.0% liked)
Technology
86131 readers
3269 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Why is .NET bad now?
10 years ago I would have said maybe. Now? Practicly everything that you run on Windows will run, in some form or another, on Linux. Even the hard to crack gaming is now becoming a non issue. There really is no point in Windows any longer.
I had no idea how easy gaming had got since my last attempt with Linux. That was until the most recent Microsoft bugs erased all my files... I was so enraged I didn't even try to recover them, I just installed linux mint. Found out I could indeed play the couple games I've been holding on to windows for. Haven't booted windows since.
That's just Windows without a lot of the bad stuff. Microsoft will never do it because they earn money from it.
Microsoft needs to die.
I remember saying that in the early 2000s...
You need to abandon windows. You know their goals. You know they can't be trusted. Stop giving them chances to get it right and fuck you.
I logged out back in December and haven't used or needed Windows since. Fedora Linux is my pick for a Windows replacement.
What you're describing is the LTSC IoT editions, which are what I run on my Windows boxes.
We have that. Its called Arch. And I've done .net development on it.
You probably mean NetCore which is not equal to .NET framework.
Do i have news for you, youll need .net.
Either for windows stuff, or for your games ( most likely launchers )
What is wrong with .NET, it's very useful when running applications which require it which of course is basically every application in a corporate environment.
But yeah all the other things are fine.
I'm fairly certain this post is specifically excluding corporate environments
I also don't quite understand the dislike of dotnet, though. I mean I don't like it either, but idk why
.net (core) is a mature framework and collection of great languages that work really well, perform really well, and is truly cross platform and open source. It's the best thing Microsoft offers.
If a "lite" version removed their ability to spy on you they'd have to charge you $4,000/year for the privilege, just to make up the difference.
It's easier to just use Linux.
windows lite
So you mean Linux? No telemetry? No ads? No AI? No .net? Also just works? Also free? Also free as in beer?
Yeah, people need Linux
.net is also on linux in some capacity. See the *arr stack as an example.
Isnt that basically enterprise?
It was my understanding enterprise edition stripped out all that bullshit.
the fact that you list .net shows you dont have the knowledge to make this claim
Install Linux, Problem Solved.
view more: next ›