Kyunw

joined 1 day ago
[–] Kyunw@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

isnt that good? so ea cant use it XD

[–] Kyunw@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

i suggesting the same stuff as you, but i got bomb with downvote XD

[–] Kyunw@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

patenting stuff and using it, is two different thing

[–] Kyunw@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

People like you are the reason everything is getting worse all the time. Keep your worthless opinions to yourself.

Maybe you should apply your advice to yourself on this one.

[–] Kyunw@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Laws (and crimes) and consumer behaviors are governed by popular concensus of what we, the body politic, are willing to tolerate - neither are absolutes, and both are subject to change.

You're right that social norms shift, but fundamental legal protections don't evaporate overnight, especially in democratic nations with institutional checks. Suggesting that society will casually normalize grave robbery for profit within our lifetimes isn't realistic.

A realistic analogy would make my point less clearly than an exaggerated cartoon.

Admitting that your argument relies on an "exaggerated cartoon" proves that your logic isn't realistic. Video game ads are a voluntary consumer choice, but grave robbery is a non-consensual crime.

If you want a realistic corporate greed analogy, look at a company intentionally polluting the air and then selling clean air filters to profit off the damage. At least that deals with actual market behavior instead of shock value crime scenarios.

[–] Kyunw@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, I just realized you're the original commenter XD

Why didn't you lead with a reasonable argument in the first place, rather than suggesting self-harm or dismissing other points of view? I actually agree with you on the domino effect, even though it doesn't really change my core view that businesses naturally try to milk it

[–] Kyunw@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't you just prove my point? If nobody buys food because I put rocks and sticks in it, I go out of business. That's exactly how consumer choice forces bad ideas to fail

[–] Kyunw@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Your point about normalization and the domino effect actually makes sense, and i agree with you on this

My main reason for leaning so heavily against that original post was that they were telling people to off themselves just for wanting to make money. Corporate monetization might be annoying, but suggesting suicide over it is way out of line.

[–] Kyunw@lemmy.world -5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (6 children)

You're comparing a non-consensual crime to a voluntary consumer product. Unlawfully exhuming a corpse leaves the victim and family with zero say in the matter.

A video game gives you complete choice, if a developer milks a game with ads, you can choose to uninstall it and give them zero dollars. Try making an analogy that actually deals with voluntary choice, because grave robbery isn't it.

Why not use a realistic analogy? Like how some car companies tried charging monthly subscriptions to activate built-in features like heated seats or remote start. BMW eventually killed that feature specifically because subscription sales were so extremely low. That's a real example of consumer choice driving corporate decisions, not grave robbery.

[–] Kyunw@lemmy.world -4 points 4 hours ago

why people keep making stupid comparison? why? just an effort to make my stand is morally wrong?

those people that got kill by the nazi have no choice, they cant simply refuse to get kill or got drag to the camp

do the game developer forces you to play their game? its your choice whether to play it or not

[–] Kyunw@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago

i think its more like "if you hate the hotel service you should move"

view more: next ›