this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
901 points (92.1% liked)
Memes
53822 readers
1365 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
We need socialism
Replacing a violent country with the system that historically always led to military dictatorships does not sound like a recipe for success.
You don't need socialism, you need northern European style capitalism
Socialism has always led to working class control of the state. It's a recipe for the uplifting of the working classes. European style capitalism relies on imperialism to fund their safety nets, and as imperialism is weakening so too are the safety nets, which is why austerity politics and the far-right are on the rise in Europe.
Please, do tell me more about... let's say... the luxembourgish imperialism. Did they conquer any new nation recently?
Luxembourg's role within western imperialism is as a tax haven. It's a micronation that gets wealthy off of finance capital and being a glorified and legalized money laundering scheme.
So imperialism is... not taxing people? That's a very fluid take on it
No? Imperialism is as I already laid out for you, a process by which the global north, dominated by monopoly finance capital, exports capital to the global south to super-exploit foreign labor for super-profits. Luxembourg's role in that international system is as a foreign tax haven for the imperialists.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/imperialism
You know you can just look up these thing right?
Not taxing your citizens, is not imperialism. Luxembourg is not an imperialist country.
The process that you're describing is called free trade. As soon as the global south doesn't want to partake in this trade, they can stop. And Luxembourg wouldn't have anything to say on that matter.
Yes, I'm aware of britannica's over-simplified, useless, liberal definition. It reduces imperialism from a well-understood phenomenon with explainable causes, mechanics, and weaknesses, into a vague, vibes-based definition about "influence." All countries influence each other for their own gain, that doesn't make them imperialist.
Luxemburg is a tax haven for foreign capital, Walmart used it to dodge billions in taxes despite not having a real presence there. The citizens of Luxemburg benefit from foreign capitalists using it to dodge taxes, and in this way participate and benefit from imperialism. You're right about one thing, it is a consequence of free trade, which is why free trade is bad.
You think that by changing the name of a thing that you've changed its nature.