this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
358 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

79476 readers
6071 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/59469059

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan@upvote.au 127 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (33 children)

Why does Apple feel they deserve a 30% cut? In cases like this, Apple aren't providing any value at all.

  • Apple aren't providing the content - the creator is.
  • Apple aren't providing a platform for the content - Patreon is.
  • Apple aren't providing a platform for discovery - people aren't finding Patreon creators solely via Apple products.

Sure, Apple are providing a payments platform, but why do they deserve 10x what Stripe charges?

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 22 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

They were sued by Epic Games for the same shit and Epic won on one count which allows them to put links to alternative payment methods and go around Apple.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_Games_v._Apple

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

So couldn't patreon just argue in court that this precedent was already set with epic?

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That is how case law works, yes.

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

I'm just wondering then why Apple would even push this if a president was already set with Epic. What a bunch of greedy corporate bastards.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I'm not a lawyer but I think they could.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)