this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
1556 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

81869 readers
4565 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California Attorney General Rob Bonta last night filed a request for a preliminary injunction in California’s existing case against Amazon for price fixing. Attorney General Bonta’s 2022 lawsuit alleged that the company stifled competition and caused increased prices across California through its anticompetitive policies in order to avoid competing on price with other retailers. New evidence paints a clearer and more shocking picture. The motion for a preliminary injunction comes after a robust discovery process where California uncovered evidence of countless interactions in which Amazon, vendors, and Amazon’s competitors agree to increase and fix the prices of products on other retail websites to bolster Amazon’s profits. Time and again, across years and product categories, Amazon has reached out to its vendors and instructed them to increase retail prices on competitors’ websites, threatening dire consequences if vendors do not comply. Vendors, bullied by Amazon’s overwhelming bargaining leverage and fearing punishment, comply — agreeing to raise prices on competitors’ websites (often with the awareness and cooperation of the competing retailer), or to remove products from competing websites altogether. Amazon’s goal is to insulate itself from price competition by preventing lower retail prices in the market at the expense of American consumers who are already struggling with a crisis of affordability.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] upandatom@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (20 children)

Your point is valid and definitely a concern.

But how are people so basic.

You hate Amazon, but just have to have your caramel syrup? Doesn't really sound like hate.

Sounds more like you do not want to have to make sacrifices to the things you like.

Wonder why bad things continue to happen.

I use Amazon too. Not trying to be too judgy, but come on. Accept some personal responsibility for your actions.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world -2 points 20 hours ago (14 children)

$1000 says you're, at best, a college kid. Probably a teenager.

Why? People with actual life experience in this shitty system don't make the personal responsibility argument because they've lived enough to know that's bullshit.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (11 children)

Companies like Amazon can't exist if people don't buy from them. The fact that you think people have to buy from them is the problem.

No one has to spend their money with Amazon. There's always going to be a personal responsibility aspect when people willingly do something they know is wrong.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world -4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

So you think people aren't responsible for where they choose to spend their money? Is Amazon holding a gun to their head?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)