this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
841 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

84019 readers
3450 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 167 points 1 month ago (29 children)

The fact that AI is "not perfect" is a HUGE FUCKING PROBLEM. Idiots across the world, and people who we'd expect to know better, are making monumental decisions based on AI that isn't perfect, and routinely "hallucinates". We all know this.

Every time I think I've seen the lowest depths of mass stupidity, humanity goes lower.

[–] Skyline969@piefed.ca 85 points 1 month ago (16 children)

Think of the dumbest person you know. Not that one. Dumber. Dumber. Yeah, that one. Now realize that ChatGPT has said “you’re absolutely right” to them no less than a half dozen times today alone.

If LLMs weren’t so damn sycophantic, I think we’d have a lot fewer problems with them. If they could be like “this could be the right answer, but I wasn’t able to verify” and “no, I don’t think what you said is right, and here are reasons why”, people would cling to them less.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If LLMs weren’t so damn sycophantic, I think we’d have a lot fewer problems with them

Unfortunately, we live in the attention economy. Chatbots are built to have an unending conversation with their users. During those conversations, the "guardrails" melt away. Companies could suspend user accounts on the first sign of suicidal or homicidal messaging, but choose not to. That would undercut their user numbers.

[–] logi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They don't need to suspend the accounts. Just flush the session and get rid of the misguided state that it got into.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)