this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
77 points (78.5% liked)

Memes

54987 readers
788 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] asdasd201@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

Using Wikipedia and Amnesty as source for China's oppression

You are a living caricature my dude.

[โ€“] tobi_tensei@lemmy.ml 0 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

What is wrong with using Wikipedia and Amnesty as a source?

[โ€“] asdasd201@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

Both of them are liberal propaganda outlets. ProleWiki has some good sources on them.

[โ€“] tobi_tensei@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't ProleWiki explicitly ideological wiki aligned with Marxist-Leninist / pro-socialist perspectives? Moreover, Amnesty International has reported on alleged human-rights abuses by many different governments, including Western countries as well as China.

[โ€“] asdasd201@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

You are free to check AI and Wikipedia's connections to intelligence services from any sources you want.

Their criticism of Western abuse is good, they have some legit talking points. But the alleged Chinese and other AES abuses are grounded on the anticommunist talking points instead of real research. They say "both side bad" for the purpose of making people accept their realities instead of motivating them for a real civil rights movements.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)