this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
492 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

82798 readers
3749 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 95 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (46 children)

Notably absent... the explosives.

But sure, if you are wondering how folks out in Yemen or Gaza managed to retaliate against their oppressors for so long, this is a textbook example of how and why. What's being proposed is collection of technology we've had since at least the 1960s that's slowly made its way into civilian circulation.

Also...

Khojayev's just-launched prototype has no effectiveness track record

I mean, we're seeing what "just-launched prototypes with no effective track record" have accomplished on the Ukraine-Russia front-lines and it's a decidedly mixed bag.

I think a harder question to answer is "Who would be interested in putting one of these into practical use?" And that gets to the real value-add of a Stinger MANPAD. Namely, the humans willing and practiced enough to use it.

Also - and again, this cannot be overstated - the model above has no explosives installed. Idk how confident I'd be around one of these things if it was actually armed.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

You can deploy a lot of $96 semi-effective hardware and improve it vs something that might be thousands or even tens or hundreds of thousands to deploy.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

You can deploy a lot of $96 semi-effective hardware

Khojayev’s just-launched prototype has no effectiveness track record

:-/

I mean, time will tell. To date, this particular iteration of technology has a 0% success rate in doing anything but farming clicks.

[–] Bad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

It also has a 0% failure rate in live strikes on targets.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Not according to Wayne Gretzky

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)