this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
537 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

83963 readers
3644 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 78 points 18 hours ago (50 children)

I seriously could do a better job than him. I have so many friends and family that used to be diehard apple fans to the point of nausea, that now think of it as a meh kind of company.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 32 points 18 hours ago (15 children)

Lol I'm a former diehard Apple hater that's been using an iPhone for 4 years and loves Apple Silicon Macs.

But I still do think they've done a lot of idiotic things lately. iOS 26 works fine on my phone (some people are reporting performance issues), but the UI is hit and miss.

Apple Vision Pro seemed doomed from the get go, but they really made it worse by not launching a cheaper headset with Air branding half a year or a year in to actually drive market share enough to make it worthwhile for developers. Could've given it an A series CPU since we now know it works in a laptop so why not in XR or whatever they're calling this.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Every decision made about the vision pro was idiotic. They didn't even have a developer kit so you had to buy the full price to device and you didn't even get developer options for your trouble so no one developed for it. It wasn't available outside of North America, it didn't have a controller so interactions were clunky, it didn't support gaming which is basically what a VR headset is for, it would only interact with an MacBook making the effective price even higher, it was uncomfortable, the battery was a randomly a separate part to absolutely zero customer benefit as it wasn't hot swappable, after the big swanky launch event Apple proceeded to completely forget about it and didn't release any updates, and as you say they never made an affordable version.

Literally every other VR headset was a superior option, and apples attempt to rebrand the product as "spatial computing" just confused everyone.

[–] ThisIsMyOldAccount@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

it didn't support gaming which is basically what a VR headset is for

Yeah i dont know. Its a tool/technology. It found a somewhat stable market in gaming and lots of its development is tied to the gaming sector. But saying that is basically what its there for is underestimating its future potential by a lot.

It was also not meant to be VR but rather pass through AR (smart approach for now as optical AR is still not as high fidelity)

Literally every other VR headset was a superior option, and apples attempt to rebrand the product as "spatial computing" just confused everyone.

Again, thats not what they were going for. Cook is apparently super excited about AR & spatial computing and kinda jumped the gun a bit if you ask me. But this was no "Oh no the gamers wont buy it because of the quest or the index etc., quick rebrand it as a spatial computing device"

This stuff is going to fundamentally change how we interact with technology in the next 100 years but apple adapting things when they had their kinks worked out and are ready for a broad audience made it a confusing product coming from them.

[–] JaymesRS@piefed.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That’s my thought too. The Vision Pro is more Newton than anything it’s compared to today. I’m sure that there will be echoes of it in some piece of tech in the next 10-15 years, but it’s not the right device for the right time right now for most people.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 6 hours ago

That's what I mean though everyone understands VR to be a gaming peripheral first and foremost. Apple then came in to that market with a non-gaming focused VR headset (sorry AR special computing headset) with no obvious practical application.

What am I supposed to do with it it can't game but it also can't do anything else. I literally can't even watch YouTube videos on it. I can watch VR videos on my phone with a piece of cardboard yet this several thousand dollar device from Apple can't do that. So why would I buy it?

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (45 replies)