this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
196 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

84603 readers
4532 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 23 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I remember back in the early 2000s, when MiniDV cameras got popular.

They were all obviously a camera just based on the look, they had an obvious lens cap, and even a clear record light so that people could see that they were being recorded.

It is insane that we have done away with all of that, and are actively camouflaging cameras in every day items.

Smart glasses should be banned.

[–] pingu@piefed.europe.pub 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What we need is regulation. These companies will not show ethical behaviour on their own.

See e.g. right to repair, USB-C.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Regulation with fines exceeding the profits made on the product.

No more static fines, or fines that are anything less than 100% of the profits made on breaching the regulations.

[–] pingu@piefed.europe.pub 4 points 5 hours ago

I believe the way EU enforces those regulations is through a supply chain sales ban. Banned products are just not sold here.

Fines are for software products and behaviours which.

load more comments (1 replies)