this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
999 points (99.2% liked)

Selfhosted

60048 readers
727 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the latest episode of "they will always sell you out" - they sold you out! Who would've thought.

Hoping for a good alternative client to appear, the writing is on the wall. Vaultwarden can't exist without "leeching" off of Bitwarden.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

But your argument falls apart against something like Syncthing's discovery networks combined with send-/receive-only folder types, which use no cloud yet allow the automatic, passive propagation of file updates to different users' devices... right? No cloud, no self-hosting, yet automatic syncing across multiple devices...

[–] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’d say that goes under

needs software and hardware

and

set it up and maintain it yourself

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

It doesn't need any hardware that I can think of, but yeah, that's true: one would need to do a lot of DIY.