this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
174 points (99.4% liked)

Selfhosted

56957 readers
941 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the latest episode of "they will always sell you out" - they sold you out! Who would've thought.

Hoping for a good alternative client to appear, the writing is on the wall. Vaultwarden can't exist without "leeching" off of Bitwarden.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RonnyZittledong@lemmy.world 41 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

Jesus, I'm tired of switching password managers.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 20 minutes ago (1 children)

KeePassXC + KeePassDX is probably the best option, with the downside of no way to sync easily (syncthing is probably the best option there)

I might switch back at some point, been getting frustrated with the bitwarden extension performance always being so poor.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 minutes ago

Sync however you want. Syncthing, Nextcloud, Dropbox, Gdrive etc.

[–] slate@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

KeePass isn't going anywhere. They're also dragging their feet on passkey support, so you might go with KeepassXC.

[–] eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca 3 points 31 minutes ago

They also don't effectively allow collaboration though, which is my cheif reason for using a cloud hosted password manager.

[–] zeitverschreib@freundica.de 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

@slate

Wasn't there some commotion a few weeks about KeepassXC and vibe coding?

@RonnyZittledong

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 5 points 43 minutes ago

Yeah, there was. It was forked because of that, actually: https://codeberg.org/ChiPass.

[–] tordenflesk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Took me like 5 minutes to move back to KeepassXC.

[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 8 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)

Every company is basically evil at this point.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 3 points 21 minutes ago

There is no ethical consumption under capitalism.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 50 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

This is why corporate promises can never be trusted, because a new CEO can change those promises on a whim.

It's part of why despite being interested in Beeper, I never signed up for it because I had questions about if those privacy promises they made would be kept if they sold to a bigger company... which they eventually did.

On the plus side Bitwarden already made an official open source self-hosted version, which can be forked and/or return to the community developed Vaultwarden roots.

Meanwhile KeepassXC keeps on chugging along.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 24 minutes ago

Oh no, and I just setup Vaultwarden

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 31 points 2 hours ago

That’s troubling, I don’t like what this portends.

The new CEOs background especially suggests they’re spiffing up the company for a later sellout, why else would they pick a merger specialist for the role?

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I think the original title was more helpful because it shows that this is a recent development. Maybe you can add "new CEO"?

Bitwarden scrubs ‘Always free’ and ‘Inclusion’ values from its website as longtime execs step down

In February, longtime CEO Michael Crandell moved to an advisory role, according to LinkedIn, with no announcement from the company. His replacement, Michael Sullivan, former CEO of both Acquia and Insightsoftware, touts his experience with “all facets of mergers and acquisitions” on his own LinkedIn page, including experience working with leading private equity firms.

CFO Stephen Morrison also left Bitwarden in April, replaced by former InVision CEO Michael Shenkman. Both Crandell and Morrison joined the company in 2019. Kyle Spearrin, who started Bitwarden as a fun hobby project in 2015, remains the company’s CTO.

[–] german@pawb.social 1 points 10 minutes ago

You're right, changed

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 3 points 41 minutes ago

Damn I guess I’m going back to keepass again since I am not really interested in hosting a vault

[–] evil_andy@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 hours ago

Well, poop.

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 3 points 59 minutes ago
[–] Mister_Hangman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Clue me in on why vaultwarden can’t exist without it?

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 hour ago

It can, but vaultwarden, as it currently is, is an implementation of the server only. So if bitwarden decides to go closed source all the way, they'd haver to start either creating their own clients or fork the current bitwarden clients.