this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
594 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

85212 readers
4072 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 82 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

reminder than during 2019 there were streaming services popping left and right, all showing tremendous growth because they started from zero, and articles were about how bad Netflix was doing due to having practically no growth compared with the competition (they already had a massive subscriber base). Twist? Netflix was the only streaming service that was actually making a profit, the rest were a massive loss but big growth.

Needless to say most of those streaming services died; who remembers DC streaming service, or Yahoo's? While Netflix is basically as stong as ever, despite the prevalent enshitification happening through the whole industry.

Point of the story? shareholders don't care about stable profitable business, only cancerous growth. AI is like that, zero profits, ton of cost, but as long as they show growth the shareholders are happy, regardless of how cooked the books are.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

2019 Yahoo

My immediate thought, there is no way Yahoo! Screen survived into 2019.

I looked it up and Yahoo! Screen (which featured Community season 6) was shutdown in January 2016. But Yahoo! View launched in late 2016 (as a Hulu-like replacement), and that did shutter in mid 2019.

So Yahoo! was already dead, but it also died for real in 2019.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine having a streaming service so bad it fails twice

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't that kind of Yahoo!'s business model?

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Actually, when Yahoo was the search giant, before Google went mainstream, they were pretty damn good at what they did.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 hours ago

With how shit Google is these days, I kinda wonder if Yahoo could dust out their search engine from two decades back and it would just be... better.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Netflix was also late to streaming because their mail service subscriptions were THE major player

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Late to streaming? Netflix was the first big time streaming service that I ever heard of. The main reason their streaming service was able to take off like it did is that nobody else of significance thought that streaming was worth pursuing. What other companies were offering streaming services at anything approaching scale before Netflix?

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

YouTube and Hulu were basically all starting about the same time. But RealPlayer was the first big one.

Netflix just had the layout that everyone uses now. The Cable networks had streaming services, just not on demand. YouTube and Hulu also pioneered the on demand layout. YouTube focused on personal experiences so maybe that's why you're forgetting them

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

YouTube started in 2005, but was not really a "streaming service", it hosted random internet posted videos. The concept of engaging with the big content rights holders wasn't remotely in sight back then.

Hulu came out a year after Netflix started streaming, by about a year. Hulu was inspired by Netflix's move to have actual traditional media content as a streaming service instead of ad-hoc video uploads like youtube.

RealPlayer offered technology for websites to provide videos, they themselves I don't recall being a streaming platform in and of itself.

Whatever one may say about Netflix, they were right there in the beginning with streaming traditional, professional media content. Yes, video playback over the internet wasn't new, but that's a technical detail that enables, but is not the core of the "streaming service" business model.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

late to streaming, but practically the first subscription based system to watch movies/tv online.

First years of Netflix were the best, the product began degrading quite early on. but that was mostly companies realizing that instead of licensing their content on Netflix, they can make their own platforms.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I think people forget that there is also the problem of being "too early" where people or the technology isn't ready yet. Netflix timed their entry perfectly.

There are so many defunct websites or businesses that no one has ever heard of that were precursors to modern day services we view as conveniences.

it's not about being the first, just the first one when the technology/cost are just right.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

who remembers DC streaming service, or Yahoo’s?

Quibi will always have a place in my heart. Or, at least, my golden arm