this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
380 points (100.0% liked)

Games

49983 readers
880 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

All the prices went up.

Also, 77m voted for Trump which is 32% of the voting age population.

As a percentage of the overall population it is ~23%.

That's not a majority.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

People who can vote and do not could just as easily have been lazy Trump voters as anything else. They're political dark matter. They don't absolve a populace.

"Of the people who didn't bother to make a choice at all, maybe most of those didn't want this" is not a compelling argument.

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The person above me said a majority voted for it and I corrected them. I'm not sure what relevance your comment has to our exchange.

“Of the people who didn’t bother to make a choice at all, maybe most of those didn’t want this” is not a compelling argument.

It's just as well I didn't make that argument then. I don't appreciate being strawmanned.

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The prices went up, and customers accepted that price. Bargaining after the deal is made generally doesn't give you a strong position.

The American definition of a voting majority is not relevant here. What matters is that Americans put Trump in place, knowing he would impose tariffs, making foreign products more expensive. Just because millions didn't vote for him, doesn't exclude them from the consequences.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The prices went up, and customers accepted that price.

No, we really didn't. It was forced on us, credit card and car debt is at record highs, homelessness increased, spending power at the average household is down. And part of the reason companies are getting refunds is over potential lost sales. I. E. Because some customers did in fact refuse to accept the price.

Americans put Trump in place

Yup. Once again, no regrer there, huh?

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I understand that Americans suffer under this and that many people are actually against tariffs. We don't have to disagree there.

However this article is just about the Sony PlayStation. No one forces people to buy a PlayStation. And Sony, a Japanese company, is also not affiliated with the US government.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

We don’t have to disagree there.

Tariffs are fine. We do them all the time. Blanket tariffs is profoundly stupid in a world with decades of free trade agreements.

Sony, a Japanese company, is also not affiliated with the US government.

Sony interactive Entertainment is an American company, moving its HQ to the US in 2016. It organizes the playstation brand and this story focuses on the Playstation division.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sony also accepted the tariffs by selling them at a higher price. Sony didn't have to keep selling in the US, no one forces them.

[–] Awooooooga@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why would Sony stop selling its products in one of the biggest consumer markets in the world just because it's people voted for a man that was going to increase taxes?

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They wouldn't. They didn't have any peoblem continuing to sell. So why do they need a refund?

[–] Awooooooga@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

If accounting, American citizens owe the rest of the planet a fucking refund.

[–] LemmyEntertainYou@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"It was forced on us so we optionally decided to pay for luxury items using other people's money via a credit card."

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, I just said part of the justification for companies getting a refund was from people NOT buying luxury goods, costing them sales.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Please stop using that logic. The people that voted is a representative sample of the population, done. Is you'd forced every one of voting she to vote then it probably would have been similar result. Because people that didn't want to go both will have their vote split randomly to candidates.

Honestly given these two choices, not voting means you're ok with either.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This completely ignores both jerrymandering and voter suppression, both things real and impactful in US voting outcomes.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sure, but even accounting for all that, what do you think would be the votes? 55% and 45% instead of 49 & 51?

Even if it was 60/40, the fact that 40% of people are actively supporting all this means it's too much.

Yes those problems are real, but that doesn't mean we should ignore the big big problem of a significant part of population that wanted/wants this even now.

[–] Awooooooga@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Americans mad at your comment, lol

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

the fact that 40% of people are actively supporting all this means it’s too much.

Yet they would have most crawled back into their caves if Trump lost. It is too much they only get empowered by "their guy" in office, and not by what he does.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It ignores it because that's a different point that's being made a.k.a moving the goal post. The people saying "oNlY 20ish % of thE poPuLaTiOn" would still claim this shit even if there were no gerrymandering at all.

Not that I'm not denying the publicly admitted election fraud, but in most western democracies AFAIK non voters are the majority. That doesn't mean none of them have legitimate leaders

[–] natecox@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

There's no moved goalpost here, my comment directly addresses the parent.

Claim: the voting populace is a direct representation of the total populace.

Rebuttal: the outcome of voting is manipulated by policy, such as jerrymandering and vote manipulation. Both of these manipulate the outcome of a vote by means outside of simple talleys. Therefore, one can not assume that any outcome is representative of popularity.