this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
622 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

87624 readers
4441 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 185 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

It's not that MapQuest won't change it, it's that the name hasn't changed.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It does matter. If entire generation of Americans grow up with Gulf of America and Lake America, that will be the name of Gulf of Mexico and Lake Ontario in the US.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

That seems like primarily a US problem

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 69 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

But Goog map added "Gulf of America" under the Gulf of Mexico while MapQuest retain the Gulf of Mexico, so even when it has changed for USA MapQuest basically saying they won't follow.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 47 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Again, not that they won't follow, it's that the name hasn't changed. Trump can do what he likes and he can probably force the executive branch to use the name in official documentation, but other than that this stunt means nothing

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

The name of something is not an inherent property of that thing. All names are assigned.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The distinction is that before Trump decided to hijack it for political purposes, the US government put a lot of thought and work into official names.

For big things like the gulf of Mexico, or lake Ontario, there shouldn't be a lot of confusion. But what about the little creek by your house? A series of inlets on a coastline? What if you have dozens of places with the same name; how do you differentiate? What if you have regional local names that differ from the name that outsiders use? What if you have competing names in general parlance? When you type it into a gps, where will it send you?

The U.S. Board of Geographical Names handled all these issues and more, and had been a trusted authority on place names, that mapmakers, businesses, and other governments all trusted to do a good job.

Still today, you can check out the GNIS and find out all kinds of cool stuff. Try searching for "Sugarloaf" to find all the mountains people named after a common thing, or "Denali" or "Washington"; you can find a lot of cool stuff on here, including alternate names for places. (https://www.usgs.gov/tools/geographic-names-information-system-gnis)

It is disgusting that the republicans are destroying years and years of slowly building trust and doing good work that helps all Americans because (check notes) it would be funny if he decreed the name were stupider?

A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.

[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 26 points 12 hours ago

Hi, I work in the map industry. We generally don't get to decide what names to use for features. We apply what the local official name is (to simplify). That's why if you're in country A, feature X might be named something different than if you're in country B. You can imagine this would (and has) caused many conflicts around the world if we didn't display the local official name. (Switch your region via VPN and you can see this in action)

If Google renamed it to Gulf of America, no Google didn't, not really ... They just inserted the new official name for that feature according to GNIS.

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 38 points 13 hours ago

And Google are a bunch of evil techdicks so of course they suck up to the orange fuhrer.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Meaning if I visit the lake they won't change all the signage?

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca -4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Well I mean I can guarantee they won't be changed around some parts of it lol. What kind of dumbass question is this? You think changing a sign makes something real?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

You think changing a sign makes something real?

For official matters, yes.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Look I'm tired of all these trans waters. I'm going to use whatever name that comes to me first and if the body of water asks me to use a different name, I'll change it.

Edit to put /s

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What official matters? There is undoubtedly now be some official documentation with this name on it. There will be lots that isn't.

Let me ask you then. Personally in your view what is the name of that lake

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You should ask a kid that when they grow up with Gulf of America and Lake America or wherever we’re at now after being on their phones for their entire lives, not people that have grown up with the entirely different name and old name.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 0 points 5 hours ago

Despite the miseducation of American youth. The name would still be lake ontario

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 29 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah, I'm pretty sure the United States can't change the name of a body of water that's shared between multiple countries. If it's not that, it still hasn't gotten any sort of congressional approval.
Edit: Lake Michigan is the only one that's fully within the US. The others are patrolled by both the US Coast Guard and the Canadian Coast Guard, both have the ability to arrest anyone on either side of the border. The state governments that border the lakes have some power over them, but they're held in trust for public use. The International Joint Commission resolves any disputes regarding them. I'm not quite sure what would have to go into changing the name of Lake Ontario, but it would at least require Canadian approval and US congressional approval, perhaps even approval from the state of New York and the province of Ontario. Oh yeah, this is also completely stupid and should under no circumstances actually happen.

[–] Vikthor@piefed.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Technically, there is no lake Michigan, only lake Michigan-Huron.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting. So why exactly is a distinction made? Some political reason from the past?

[–] uid0gid0@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

It's simply convention. Although the Straits of Mackinac are 5 miles wide at the narrowest point, in relation to the size of the lakes it makes a significant demarcation. Sort of like the Straits of Gibraltar and the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 27 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Gonna be really hard to get Canadian congressional approval as we have no congress

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 15 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'm well aware. I meant approval from both the congress of the United States and the government of Canada. I just wrote it a little awkwardly.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 9 points 12 hours ago

I know, just messing

Well you guys better get right on that soon cause we need your congressional approval ASAP!

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That sounds nice.

If Trump really wants to turn the screws, he can make it a requirement of federal contracts that all contractors use maps that comply with his infantile demmands.

I think you're kind of living in a pre-Trump reality where laws and procedures means something. It's a super bad idea to feel comfortable with this administration because something they want to do is technically illegal. Everything is up for grabs right now.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 2 points 7 hours ago

I partly just thought that going over what it would require could be interesting. You're right, he can try to make contractors do that. But that doesn't mean that citizens of either country are actually going to honor the name. Sure, Google and Apple will change their maps to suck him off, but nearly nobody is ever going to unironically call it Lake America. I live in Alabama, a deeply conservative state that borders the Gulf of Mexico. Even here, nobody calls it the Gulf of America. Odds are, he'll forget about this shit just as quickly.

[–] chunk6235@piefed.social 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure the United States can't change the name of a body of water that's shared between multiple countries.

Someone forgot about the GuLf Of AmErIcA already

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't forget, but I'm pretty sure Trump has. I don't think he's talked about it in quite a while. I've never heard anybody actually call it the Gulf of America, and I live in the Deep South. I'm not sure it's even used by the departments in the executive branch. This will probably be a similar situation.

[–] chunk6235@piefed.social 3 points 5 hours ago

I see it on maps sometimes (fucking Google being Google), so it irritates me whenever I run across it

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't forget. Name never changed

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Except that it was for over 300 million people

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

No it wasn't. Executive orders don't have the authority to change the names of jack shit.

Even post offices need a fucking Congressional bill to change their name.