this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
247 points (99.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

4979 readers
834 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

EDINBURG, Texas (AP) — Quinten Martinez, pumping gas under a hot South Texas sun, remembers a time when fueling up didn’t require difficult decisions.

“Is it going to be groceries this week?” asked the 28-year-old Amazon delivery driver as he watched the numbers tick higher. “Is it gonna be getting gas in our tank to go to work?”

He shook his head when asked about President Donald Trump’s assertion last week that higher gas prices are a small price to pay for the war with Iran.

“I don’t feel like it’s a good trade-off,” Martinez said. “I don’t feel like this is good for anyone.”

Voters across the country, and across the political spectrum, tend to agree.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

“I don’t feel like it’s a good trade-off,” Martinez said. “I don’t feel like this is good for anyone.”

Climate scientists have been telling us for 30 years we need to stop burning fossil fuels.

personally I'd rather we had $100 a gallon and deal with the consequences of that rather then cheap gasoline and diesel and deal with the cosequences of that

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

A $300/ton CO2 tax (paid as dividend to residents) is $3/gallon gasoline. It doesn't get to your $100/gallon target, but it does bring CO2 air capture technology into play. accelerates EVs/emobility, makes green H2 competitive for those who need to refuel often and aviation/heavy shipping. Obviously solar/wind are that much more economically obvious.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I'm with you bro, I pray the gas prices keep going up. The redneck shitbags are still driving their giant heehaw trucks around all day and night. I'll know gas prices are high enough when harrassing your neighbors stops being a recreational daily event.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's a fair point for sure, but it'll only matter if billionaires and major corporations are impacted. It's air travel that's the worst culprit.

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

From the EPA. We also need to decarbonize our electricity generation and whatever "industry" means exactly, and how we heat our buildings.

[–] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 2 points 18 hours ago

Yeah. If it was any one thing then we could have made massive progress already.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Is it just me, or the colors in the first chart don't match the color key?

[–] blackberry28@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

Seems to be just you

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

They look a little darker in the key compared to the filled regions of the chart, but it's probably the same as the lines above those filled regions.

Edit: since I can see the grid through the data, I'd imagine the regions have had their opacity reduced.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I mean the billionaires are not going to be the biggest abusers of flights. Everyone travels. I imagine spirit flys more flights than all the billionaires combined.

[–] gastroglizzy@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

All that will accomplish is making sure only the wealthy can afford to drive. The rest of us will still be expected to get to work on time.

[–] gewindestift@feddit.org 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Which is a good thing. Public Transport or nobody working. Make your choice politicians.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 12 hours ago

Homeless vagrants? Straight to the jail work camps!

[–] blackberry28@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

Depends how much gas prices rise. If more Americans would drive compact compact cars instead of driving super inefficient gas guzzling Trucks that use 20l per 100km, you could save a lot of money and don't have to drive less.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 1 points 17 hours ago

All that will accomplish is making sure only the wealthy can afford to ~~drive~~ be chauffeured. FTFY