this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
464 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

78029 readers
3215 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 7 months ago (15 children)

I deal with large data chunks and 40TB drives are an interesting idea.... until you consider one failing

raids and arrays for these large data sets still makes more sense then all the eggs in smaller baskets

[–] remon@ani.social 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (9 children)

You'd still put the 40TB drives in a raid? But eventually you'll be limited by the number of bays, so larger size is better.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

Of course, because you don't want to lose the data if one of the drives dies. And backing up that much data is painful.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)