this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
96 points (92.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

36252 readers
36 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ive often seen individuals on the left talking about how billionares shouldnt exist etc., but when probed on how that could be accomplished the answer is usually just taxes or guillotines. I dont think either is great.

What if instead, corporations were made to be unable to be sold or owned. Initially theyre made to default to popular election for their board, and after that they can set up a charter or adopt a standard one, ratified by majority vote of their employees.

Bank collapse would probably follow, how could that be remedied? Maybe match the banks invalidated stocks with bonds?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (13 children)

How would you get anyone to take risks and start a business

People create things all the time without a profit motive. Assuming they have a good safety net behind them that allows them to start up there ideas people will create. Case in point the app were on right now, it's developed open source with no profit motive, no stocks, no company. It's built by a bunch of hardline communist who believe in an open social network.

What banks

There are credit unions that function as co-ops with no stock ownership

they would have absolutely nothing as collateral

Co-ops can have collateral just like any other business, property of a store or factory, stock ( in the product sense ) etc. Yeah we wouldn't have silicon valley with vcs betting millions on unproven tech, but do we really need that?

Also this is all assuming there's no state involvement or planning. The state has a great credit line that it can use to backstop loans for small cooperative enterprises or just create the enterprises itself, eg. City run grocery stores like zohrans been pitching.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 8 months ago (10 children)

But why would people take loans out to start businesses if there’s no way to pay the loan back? Where is any profit from the business going?

Without ownership of a company there’s no reason for anyone to start a company and take on all the risk.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

aLl ThE rIsK

The owners are risking their fuck-around money. The workers are risking their shelter.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You think everyone that starts a business are rich already?

The people taking the risk by starting the company are the ones risking everything, not the employees that they hire lol

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

"Rich" is a relative term. But nobody starts a business when their basic needs aren't already met, because they literally wouldn't be able to. That inherently makes them richer than the job seekers.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 8 months ago

People start businesses all the time when their “basic needs aren’t met” because they need to earn money to be able to meet their basic needs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)