this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
481 points (73.7% liked)

Memes

51680 readers
1476 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (20 children)

Democrats

  • Retain marriage rights for gay couples.

  • Expand legality of recreational drugs.

  • Free food for schoolchildren.

  • Tax credits for families with children.

  • Subsidized for free childcare.

  • Expand electric car charging nationally.

  • Subsidize sustainable fuel sources.

  • Fact based education standards.

  • Stop racism in policing.

  • Expanded healthcare subsidies.

  • Preserve democracy.

Republicans

  • Being gay or trans should be illegal.

  • White supremacy is great!

  • Christianity as national religion.

  • Privatize the post office and weather service.

*Eliminate the EPA, Department of Education.

  • Defund IRS.

  • Disenfranchise nonwhites and women.

  • Antivax agenda.

  • Expand fossil fuel use.

  • Eliminate worker safety laws.

  • Eliminate collective bargaining and union rights.

  • Defunding science research.

  • Deregulate crypto.

  • No regulations on AI.

  • No recognition of child's educational or bodily autonomy rights.

  • Eliminate hate crime laws except for straight white men.

  • End democracy, install fascist dictatorship.

But yeah, they are totally the same, right guys? RIGHT!?!

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well, Democrats are the less evil choice, but all this is peanuts compared to EU social standard, I see here in Spain often US tourists which thinks they are in the future, IN SPAIN, with the rights, services and the freedom people has. Even with the US Democrates, it's compared like the EU fifty years ago.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The EU and the Democrats are both supporting the modern holocaust, neither of them are in a position to talk about "social standards."

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Don't confuse the statement with the capability to realize it. In the same moment when Netanyahu travel to the EU, in the same moment he will get arrested, but the EU can't invade Israel to capture him, less without the support from the US. But the change is on the way.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In the same moment when Netanyahu travel to the EU, in the same moment he will get arrested

No. Please don't make claims about things you don't know about. It makes it sound like you're lying deliberately.

But the change is on the way.

Maybe in your imaginary dream land that I assume you were referring to with your comment about the EU arresting Netanyahu, not in the real world though. Please try and remember we are talking about the real world.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Certainly not all EU members will arrest him, but the most will. The ICC statement is clear, the problem for some countries is the USA and beeing a NATO member (sadly) at the same time Israel is supported by the USA. This is because some countries are still hesitant, not for other reasons. The real world is this, and because more and more countries want to turn the EU sovereign respect the US. Trumps BBB and Tariffs for the EU, probably will accelerate this process in August 1, in the manner of selfdefense.

The International Criminal Court's arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu remain valid and binding on all EU member states after judges rejected Israel's appeal to withdraw them on July 16, 2025[^1][^2].

EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell emphasized that implementing the warrants "is not optional" for EU states[^3]. However, European countries are divided on enforcement:

Countries confirming they would arrest Netanyahu:

  • Netherlands: "If he comes to Dutch soil, he will be arrested," said Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp[^4]
  • Ireland: Prime Minister Simon Harris stated Netanyahu would "absolutely" be arrested[^5]
  • Spain: The Foreign Ministry confirmed Spain "will comply with its commitments"[^5]
  • Belgium: Initially said it would arrest Netanyahu but later Premier Bart De Wever stated "practical considerations prevail over ethical considerations" and doubted any European country would make the arrest[^6]

Countries refusing or hesitant:

  • Hungary: Prime Minister Viktor Orbán called the warrants "shameful" and invited Netanyahu with guarantees against arrest[^7]
  • Germany: Government spokesperson said it's "hard to imagine arrests could be made"[^1]
  • France: Claims Netanyahu has "immunities" from prosecution[^8]
  • Italy: Foreign Minister Tajani called Netanyahu's arrest "unfeasible"[^9]

The warrants accuse Netanyahu of war crimes and crimes against humanity, including using starvation as a method of warfare in Gaza between October 2023 and May 2024[^10]. While all 27 EU states are legally obligated to enforce ICC warrants, political considerations have created a rift in their response[^3].

[^1]: Politico - Netanyahu arrest warrant: Where can he still go in Europe? [^2]: Straits Times - ICC judges reject Israel's request to withdraw Netanyahu arrest warrant [^3]: EurActiv - ICC arrest warrant for Netanyahu 'binding' on member states [^4]: Channel 4 - Netanyahu arrest warrant: Europe split over ICC ruling [^5]: Newsweek - Netanyahu Arrest Warrant: Full List of Countries That Will Comply with ICC [^6]: The Hindu - Is Netanyahu Above the Law? [^7]: Sweden Herald - Netanyahu Heads to EU Despite ICC Arrest Warrant [^8]: Washington Examiner - EU says arresting Netanyahu 'not optional' as members waiver on warrant [^9]: i24 News - ICC Upholds Arrest Warrants Against Benjamin Netanyahu & Yoav Gallant [^10]: Al Jazeera - ICC prosecutor warned to drop Netanyahu case or be 'destroyed'

[–] only_in_ohio@sh.itjust.works -4 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Those memes are just contributing to the issue of young people skipping the elections, and then complaining about our leaders being stupid

[–] piefood@feddit.online 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Well, then maybe the Democrats should fix that, by putting out candidates that young people actually want to vote for.

[–] only_in_ohio@sh.itjust.works -5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There are too little young voters to make it a viable strategy for either side

[–] piefood@feddit.online 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Based on that logic, it sounds like there are too few young voters to worry about memes stopping them from voting.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

No, even the US has more parties than only those two. In Spain we also had a two party system a lot of years ago, but this changed when the people begone to vote also for other parties than those two, with this we have now several different parties, that makes that there have to create aliances to obtain the mayority do be able to govern, so corresponding more on the reallity of the needs of the people, out of this black and white scheme (or better bright and dark grey). In the US is needed that also enter left wing parties, which represent the basic rights of the people, which currently don't exist, because they are "anti-american communists", this is the mantra with which they create the fear in the people to vote it.

[–] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Fact based education standards.

Teaching a bunch of lies about American exceptionalism and how imperialism is actually good isn’t what I’d call “fact based”

Stop racism in policing

Right like how democrats in nearly all major cities increased police funding and almost none passed any meaningful reform.

Expanded healthcare subsidies

But don’t remotely consider universal healthcare

Preserve democracy

Preserve the status quo which I wouldn’t call a democracy. A democracy enacts the will of the people, democrats don’t even have a democratic primary for their own party.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] piefood@feddit.online 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (10 children)

I think you dropped this:

Democrats & Republicans

  • Bombed kids
  • Tortured innocent people
  • Increased the surveillance state
  • Took money from the poor and working class, and gave it to their rich friends
  • Spent billions on wars, while claiming that they couldn't afford to fix our healthcare or housing problems
  • Boasted about deporting more people than Republicans
  • Backed a Genocide
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)