this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
694 points (84.2% liked)

Technology

77795 readers
2513 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 59 points 4 months ago (16 children)

This makes about as much sense as calling Linux users "Windows vegans".

Choosing to not use AI isn't some wacky contrarian position, it's a tame position that can easily be justified. (Don't want to use AI? Then don't.) If anything, trying to assert that constantly using AI for everything would be the new normal is the wacky position.

[–] rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 19 points 4 months ago (13 children)

Not eating animals is not a wacky contrarian position either, and I'm not even vegan

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago (12 children)

So I'm gonna play devil's advocate here and say that it is. Look at your teeth, humans are omnivores. Cutting out half the diet you evolved to consume is in fact a contriarian position. Not that I have any issues with vegans or vegetarians, just from an anatomical point of view we were designed to eat some meat! I do think calling people who don't use AI "AI vegans" is absurd though, as diet has absolutely nothing to do with use of AI. Would be more accurate to say their AI fasting if we're gonna use food related terms.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

they're not advocating for any of those, and they're not committing a falacy.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)