this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
631 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

74247 readers
4199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/34873574

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 241 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

This is truly dystopian. A ruling in Springer's favor here could imply that modifying anything on a webpage, even without distribution, would constitute a copyright violation (EDIT: only for material in which the copyright holder does not grant permission for the modification; so not libre licensed projects). Screen readers for blind people could be illegal, accessibility extensions for high contrast for those visually impaired could become illegal, even just extensions that change all websites to dark mode like Dark Reader could become illegal. What constitutes modification? Would zooming in on a website become illegal? Would translating a website to a different language become illegal? Where does this end?

This needs to be shot down.

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Dystopian, yes

Also Fascist

Something we never want to see in German politics in particular

[–] Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I don't see a reason to have a preference for a specific geographic region to not be influenced by fascism. Fascism should not be instituted anywhere, in any scenario. Unfortunately, it's on the rise globally, and I'd personally prefer it not be present anywhere at all, not just in an area in which it has had previous influence.

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's like cancer.

It's never good. But when it's already taken hold once, you want to be extra vigilant.

[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 6 points 2 days ago

Right? It's especially worth at least a second or even third glance in places that have a historical predilection to metastatic fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)