this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
561 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

75258 readers
3690 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Should OS makers, like Microsoft, be legally required to provide 15 years of security updates?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 day ago (11 children)

That sounds like an insane duration, even LTS distros are not usually anything like 15 years

[–] iesha_256@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

this isn’t about the age of the OS, it’s the age of the device. I can install linux on a device from 20 years ago if not more.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 7 points 23 hours ago

Ahh, so the win11 arbitrary hardware requirements bullshit

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't know. just the other day somebody on lemmy was asking about installing a 32bit linux distro on an old netbook and the majority of comments were discussing whether there was any practical reason for distros to continue 32-bit support.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 20 hours ago

That’s unfortunate, but still leaves you 20 years worth of devices if they drop 32-bit.

load more comments (8 replies)