this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
532 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

78121 readers
1552 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Based on current deployment rates, it is likely that solar will surpass wind as the third-largest source of electricity. And solar may soon topple coal in the number two spot.

Looking ahead, through July 2028, FERC expects no new coal capacity to come online based on its “high probability additions” forecast. Meanwhile 63 coal plants are expected to be retired, subtracting 25 GW from the 198 GW total, and landing at about 173 GW of coal capacity by 2028. Meanwhile, FERC forecasts 92.6 GW of “high probability additions” solar will come online through July 2028.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 40 points 3 months ago (27 children)

Even with an admin as renewable-hostile as the current one, you just can’t beat cheap, I guess.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (15 children)

It’s not actually cheap though, that’s the problem. Basically every country that is pushing “renewables” are having their power bills increase over and over and over with no sign of slowing down because it’s not cheap.

No one wants to build them without giant subsidies and guaranteed returns. Why do you think that is?

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Solar panels crom China made it a lot cheaper than it used to be. There are also other major advatnages, such as increased independence. You just buy a bunch of solar panels and now you can indenepdently generate energy for the next 30 years.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Solar panels are not the expensive part of using solar to power the country - the storage and transmission is.

Although having said that, the cost of regularly cleaning panels, replacing them, throwing them in landfill, and mining materials to make new ones every 15 years or so is also huge - and destructive to the planet. It’s just more of a slow burn cost that snowballs.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

True, batteries are quite expensive and very much not environment-friendly when built on such a scale. Though it should be noted good solar panels last longer than 15 years. Even cheap panels can last 20 years.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 2 months ago

They need regular cleaning otherwise they can very quickly drop to close to zero output, and storms - especially hail - can destroy entire solar farms at once.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)