this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
280 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

78098 readers
2553 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

JP Morgan Chase has told staff moving into its new headquarters in New York that they must share their biometric data to access the multibillion-dollar building.

The investment bank had previously planned for the registering of biometric data by employees at its new Manhattan skyscraper to be voluntary.

However, employees of the US’s biggest bank who have started work at the headquarters since August have received emails saying that biometric access was “required”, according to communications seen by the Financial Times.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Biometrics aren't passwords they are usernames, passwords necessarily change I'm not changing my fingerprints or iris or bhole or whatever they want to scan. With how easy it is to copy someone's bio markers vs stealing their password this would be a huge security risk if they want to use it for entry to secured facilities.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 2 months ago

You think it’s easy to steal someone fingerprint or iris in a way that will work on scanners?

How?

load more comments (3 replies)