this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
913 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

77769 readers
2698 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Regna@lemmy.world 300 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (30 children)

At first I thought ”Well, duh!”, but the manufacturer having a remote kill switch when he network blocked his vacuum from sharing his home map data with them, as well as unprotected root access when connecting to the vacuum… urgh.

The engineer says he stopped the device from broadcasting data, though kept the other network traffic — like firmware updates — running like usual. The vacuum kept cleaning for a few days after, until early one morning when it refused to boot up.

After reverse engineering the vacuum, a painstaking process which included reprinting the devices’ circuit boards and testing its sensors, he found something horrifying: Android Debug Bridge, a program for installing and debugging apps on devices, was “wide open” to the world. “In seconds, I had full root access. No hacks, no exploits. Just plug and play,” Narayanan said.

[–] pipe01@programming.dev 64 points 1 month ago (18 children)

Is it just me, or is having ADB exposed physically not that big a deal?

[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 112 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tend to agree, security is always the goal but if someone is in my house hacking my vacuum, I have bigger issues. The no-notice remote kill is the bigger issue to me.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The much bigger concern is that the pathway used to send the remote kill command could very easily be utilized by nefarious actors.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

To do what, wear out one section of carpet faster than the rest of your house?

[–] subignition@fedia.io 14 points 1 month ago

If a hacker can get into the device remotely it can be an entry point to your home network.

[–] teft@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Remote “kill”

Where does it end? First it wears down your carpets and then we’re in Maximum Overdrive.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

It finds a sharp corner to rub against and hones itself into a stabby bot.

[–] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

It could overcharge and overheat the battery, leading to explosion or at least fire.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)