this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
632 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

78029 readers
3279 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 month ago (35 children)

Tesla has sold 7 million and something cars in total according to google. If each of those was 100k, that would still be less than a trillion in total. How could one guy get paid more than the whole company ever made?

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This is supposed to be paid out over time based on future performance milestones. Also based on projected increased value of shares as a result.

Still insanely, insanely high though.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Still insanely, insanely high though.

But undeniably worth it if you're a tesla shareholder.

It's like your financial adviser saying "I'll make you a billionaire in 5 years, and if I do your bill will be $1mil. If I don't, don't pay me anything, and you've lost nothing" - why would anyone have an issue with that?

[–] bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 month ago

Because it's an incentive to make money, not an incentive to be a good corporation making good products and services.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)