You just asked an AI to assemble a list of sources, which you haven't actually read or examined. Now I'm expected to go through each of them, putting in substantially more work in order to refute them. Work which you will most likely disregard anyway. You didn't even bother to provide links, so apparently I'm supposed to hunt these documents down myself.

Give me two to three sources, that you have actually read, that specifically call it a genocide, that don't come from the US government (or other Western governments), and also don't rely on far-right crackpot Adrian Zenz.

[+] JahuteSkye@lemmy.world -6 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

I gave you the effort I thought you deserved 👍

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

if you don’t immediately accept it without evidence, it means you’re a genocide denier, a bad person, basically a fascist who shouldn’t even be engaged with (conveniently averting the need to provide evidence).

As usual, by failing to accept a claim made without evidence, I have proven that I don't "deserve" real evidence. Funny how that works, isn't it? I mean, if you think about it, if you were wrong, you'd never find out, since you never seriously look at the evidence.

Some of us actually practice something called, "critical thinking."