Creating slop featuring Tung Tung Tung Sahur is more important, than travelling by EVs! /j
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
590 points (98.4% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
40777 readers
4049 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I've never heard that the power grid couldn't handle electric vehicles
So, working for a power company, I have some insight for you on this. This is still the power companies doing bullshit, but there is some truth to the grid being unable to handle electric vehicles. We are seeing the same issue with electric tankless water heaters.
Most companies, unless you ask and pay for it, will size a transformer for your house as small as they can get away with. 15 to 25kVA is kinda standard for overhead, while 50 to 75kVA for padmount is usual (because the same transformer will serve two to four houses).
If you install a fast charger on your house, and run the dryer, and the water heater turns on, the fuse will blow on the transformer. Then you call in an outage, they have to put a new fuse on, and usually don't tell you what was wrong. Then once you figure it out, they have to tell you that you can't do all that (and lose revenue from all the downtime and sending a technican) or they have to put up a bigger transformer.
It's far easier to say "lol our grid is old and bad" than "we don't want to spend out profits on needed upgrades and maintenance". Meanwhile, data centers are exclusively connected directly to a substation that can handle their needs or to their own dedicated transformer banks directly off of transmission lines. Never are they on some back woods tap fifteen miles from their substation.
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/07/01/why-the-ev-boom-could-put-a-major-strain-on-our-power-grid.html
It was definitely a talking point for a bit. It was looked into and proven incorrect. It was most likely always a lie to further discourage people on the fence from giving up gas cars. I'm sure it had an impact on some people out there so it probably worked.
The models literally assumed everyone charged their car at exactly the same time. It was all anti EV bullshit from the start.
100%
Even when it was easily proven incorrect it remained a common talking point from people opposed to EVs. Much of that opposition was for ideological/financial reasons, so facts didn’t really matter.
Most anti EV people I've spoken to just repeat the same old untrue things. It's more expensive in electricity to charge it, you can't drive it interstate, the grid can't handle it, the electricity generated is worse than petrol emissions, the batteries are pure Evilium or something that will eradicate all life on Earth, you can't even drive it to work because the range is bad, it will lose range and be undrivable in 5 years, etc…
None of it true of course. But the truth has never stopped a good story
I wonder whether production of gasoline (per car) takes more power than charging a car
That was the argument my conservative coworkers made - "I would support electric vehicles, but our grid cannot handle them"
You must not hang around with morons.
Ok
No, see, it's because we have so many electric vehicles that the grid has extra capacity for data centers! It's just math, duh.
Good point, except it's kinda dumb of us to act like the hypocrisy is particularly relevant.
It's lying, it's bad faith, it's violence.
They go to massive lengths to pretend it's not, so yes, it is always a fantastic use of time to tell that truth about it. They do care, deeply, about not being perceived that way.
I know the post isn't wrong per se, but the fact that it seems to be all I hear means we, ourselves, don't have this the right way round. Let's focus on the focus that changes things, not scores dumb points on our end.
That said: great post 😎
I can keep my EV charged up most of the time with a 120v outlet. Sometimes if I need a full charge I will hook it up to the 240v 20a outlet and it will top it up.