this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
101 points (97.2% liked)

Mildly Interesting

27182 readers
353 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

This sounds like total bullshit. Money runs the world. There’s plenty of “they” with money.

[–] AccoSpoot1@lemmy.world 37 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I'm sure he'd loathe the comparison but this reminded me of an Alan Moore quote

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 11 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

... and the billionaires keep kicking things and flipping random switches to try to wrench the world into their favored shape, and the rest of us are trapped on this ship with them.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago

The world isn’t rudderless, in fact its the opposite. There are so many rudder that they run into each other constantly and get in each other's way. Occasionally you can get a group of people to aim them in roughly the same direction for a little while, but they inevitably decide their direction is better than yours. If you're lucky they're on the outside edge of the group.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The other possibility is that plenty of analysts, historians, cultural advisors, etc know exactly how things work and what's going on but he doesn't listen to them because they're 'little people'.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yep, they tend to not listen to them because they listen to their PR people, polls etc., more. It's sad, but after years of trying to see politics in its full complexity I'm coming back to "politicians are the problem". At least those that win elections. How can we turn that ship around?

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 1 points 1 hour ago

Maybe we should have talent agents that campaign for candidates. Winning a campaign is a whole skillset that tells us very little how well a person can actually govern.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 21 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Most people give the government way too much credit when it comes to competency.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 47 minutes ago

I would say that, paradoxically, the opposite is true as well.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 4 points 1 hour ago

You're not wrong, but I'm still amazed that the it's possible for me to mail a letter from Los Angeles and have it arrive in Berlin in less than a month.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

That dead piece of shit was never invited to anything that ever functioned

rot in piss

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 15 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I'd abstract it even further: There's no They - the system is self-sustaining. And it will run amok if it isn't regulated.

I mean it, in a well regulated (and preferably global) democracy people like Trump and Musk would just be unhappy psychopaths way too fixated on money, not the richest / most powerful people of a huge country.

I don't know this senator Graham but I suspect he's glossing over a lot of cronyism when he says "There's only we, and we ususally don't know what the fuck we're doing."

Oh how I dream we will have a self-regulating system one day.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 46 minutes ago

The "self" in "self-regulating" for a functioning democracy is the citizens within it.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I've been reading about "systems thinking" recently, and it's fascinating stuff.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Resilient systems are self-organizing

Nice.

It almost - almost - makes religion make sense, at least as a concept. Something to help grasp the felt complexity of our planet, the universe.