this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
45 points (83.6% liked)

Technology

43291 readers
291 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 51 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It might be possible to fool it.

More important, it's normalizing use of facial recognition in everyday situations. This is a very invasive tech and prime for abuse by increasingly totalitarian governments.

[–] nebirus@beehaw.org 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is good practice to create a different password for each service. That way, if one service is compromised, your adversary cannot use that password to unlock everything else.

That may sound onerous, but thanks to selfie-login technology, you can instead simply use a different face for each account.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 9 points 2 days ago

I lost access to my face and back up face, how do I log in?

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hello, my name is Hugh Jackman.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

... you killed my father. Prepare to die.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 33 points 3 days ago

ICE: unlock your ph...ohh nevermind, it's unlocked using your face.

[–] oats@beehaw.org 21 points 3 days ago

Yeah, thanks but no thanks.

The biggest thing I'll use is fingerprint on my phone, caus its comfy, and quickly disabled should the need arise

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

As I've said before: HOW ABOUT NO

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 2 days ago

no thanks... I rather lose my google account

What could possibly go wrong ?

/s

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

So what do we do about my evil twin brother who is a supervillain?

I didn't believe this was a problem until I watched my wife and her twin sister unlocking each others phones (they aren't identical but they do look quite a lot alike)

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Did i just time travel or is this the feature i have been refusing to use on my phone for almost a decade?

Yeah November 2017; 8 years ago

Is this implemented very different technologically speaking?

[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 9 points 2 days ago

faceId is completely in device. This is a video that is sent to google to process

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's unlocking your phone, this is unlocking your entire Google account (e.g. on a new device)

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Is that really that different?

The article doesn’t go into any length to explain the technology. But assuringly its just an encrypted passcode created with an algorithm using measured face data.

Crafting a secure reliable personal id based on pure visual appearance has been tricky and when this came out i disliked it but it was clearly a feat.

What is the story here?

Google trusting this technology?

Them adding age verification to it?

I am just confused what makes this enough of something to write/post it.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Is that really that different?

Conceptionally yes. You can refuse to unlock your phone with your face. You cannot refuse to allow Google to access your account (and thus your phone, too) with a picture of your face -no matter how bad the tech is- if Google implements this.

[–] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You will have to set this feature up ahead of time if you want the option of regaining account access with a selfie later on.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, I certainly hate Google, but I'm not sure I find it likely that they'll force every user to upload a video of themselves. I do think many will do it willingly, though.

[–] jansk@beehaw.org 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Very different, I would say. The security implication of authorising you on a new device is much more severe than logging you into a device you are already authorised against.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 7 points 3 days ago

Exactly, someone spoofing the biometrics to unlock my phone relies on them having physical access, whereas spoofing the biometrics on an account that can be accessed anywhere in the world is quite a bit bigger of a threat

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Your phone stores the code on the device and does facial recognition locally. Apps on your phone only receive that data if they explicitly request your camera and perform the recognition themselves.

This is vastly different than sending Google a video of your face that they save on their servers and use to analyze future selfie videos.

But assuringly its just an encrypted passcode created with an algorithm using measured face data.

From the article:

Selfie videos can be used for login purposes, to verify your age for accessing certain account features, and to create an AI avatar.

It's not just an encrypted passcode.

[–] oats@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago

Maybe its "unlocking" stuff on your desktop browser with your phone, like the new captchas where you have to scan a QR and receive a code via SMS (seriously google, what the heck)