this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
124 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

50017 readers
656 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

[Petition for US](https://www.change.org/p/ban-meta-glasses-ray-ban-from-public-and-private-use)

Petition for UK

[–] keyhoh@piefed.social 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

There's a very easily way to rid society of these. Buy a pair of glasses and follow politicians and their families around and post constant updates about them on social media.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 minutes ago

Nah, you will just individually get sent to jail or shot by the police depending on the country, and that'll be enough of a warning to everyone else.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 22 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I don't think "smart glasses" are the problem. The term is too broad. The problem is, more specifically, cameras pointed at people constantly, with those cameras being designed to upload 100% of the data to surveillance systems, owned by surveillance companies.

It's totally possible to have "smart glasses" like GoPro that just record locally. Or ones that connect to a local AI model.

The obligatory response to this is "there's no expectation of privacy in public places", and they're right, and changing that comes with a whole boatload of new problems, like recording public servants/officials.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 minutes ago

The obligatory response to this is "there's no expectation of privacy in public places",

That is a USA-specific legal standard which doesn't apply in much of the world. While it has it's upsides it also has downsides and it shouldn't be seen as gospel, or the only way to do things.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Similarly I have no issues with people using dashcams, but I have issues with dashcams that upload to third party companies without anyones knowledge.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, I can see a use for smart glasses. Specifically in assisting the hard of hearing, those with partial blindness, maybe even people with other disabilities as well. But the upload of data and cameras recording people without their knowledge and consent is a problem. Not just a problem, but the problem.

But also our laws have a habit of not catching up to the reality of how people use tech to violate the rights of others and that really needs to be addressed. Not against consumers but against tech firms and manufacturers.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The tech companies literally live and die on the idea that traditional governments can't keep up... and it's also why the jackass tech barons think they should own and be in charge of everything instead.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The governments want this. TIA never died.

Nice, it's been a solid decade since anyone has mentioned Total Information Awareness. Deep cut.