this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
282 points (96.1% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

46963 readers
1387 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Gallery image 2

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago

This is so ridiculous I hope it's fake.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

In my town benches are the recreational place for teenagers. What are teens/young people supposed to do?

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 hours ago

Looks like a private sign posted on private property. Can be ignored.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

The anti-property tax propaganda is from the real estate hoarding corporate owners. As usual, these anti-tax wingnuts latch on to “why should I pay property tax (insert selfish reason here)” when the real reason is the real estate hoarding companies don’t want to pay property taxes on all the properties they’ve hoarded and are likely sitting empty. The same properties they used to price people out of homebuying, the same ones they used to increase rent super high because you can’t afford a home and will own nothing.

And of course anti-tax wingnuts don’t care that property taxes pay for schools, police, fire services,etc. (ain’t got no kids so why should I pay for school? My house has never burned down. Who needs cops when I got a Smith and Wesson?) and those things will still have to be paid for via some kind of tax, so in the end they still pay but the absentee owners get a huge tax break.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

What about the younger handicap's? Are they all screwed because of those stinking Boomers? One day in the distant future we'll need to do something about those Boomers. /s

[–] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 2 points 5 hours ago

Kids don't play outside anymore. Also Why are there kids outside!!!

[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Surely, that sign is more expensive than any sort of additional maintenance cost from people using your bench...?

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I doubt this is about bench maintenance and more about giving and excuse to chase homeless people and kids away from the area. In other places they just use bench designs that are uncomfortable or make it impossible to lay down.

[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

Ah, well that's just fucking lovely. So, presumably they're legally required to put a bench there, but they would also rather not have anyone actually exist there...

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Some of Gen X is elderly now, too.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 35 points 15 hours ago

You can tell that you live in a society that's about to totally collapse when you see signs like this.

[–] svdasein@lemmy.world 80 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I think we may have bigger fish to fry these days; billionaires love it when little people fight amongst themselves. It's high comedy because in the mean time they're well on their way to owning everything.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 43 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I disagree wholeheartedly. This is a dumb exclusionary policy being fairly pointed out, not ageism.

I'll explain it with a comparision of the language used.

The language used for benches like this in my country, Australia: "Priority seating. Please stand for seniors and handicapped people".

Priority, based on needs. Anyone can use it otherwise.

The language used in this sign: "Benches are for seniors are handicapped citizens only"

Exclusionary, based on privilege and needs. If you are old and infirm and a citizen ONLY YOU may ever use this bench, and if you're not a citizen (tourist, asylum seeker, migrant worker) you can fuck off regardless of your needs.

This is not a subtle distinction. This is language used to assert a hierarchy and exclude underclasses, and it's embedded into every aspect of your society without most people even noticing because they've never seen different.

[–] svdasein@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

I don't disagree with you. My point is simply that in the US right now there's a concerted effort to keep the citizenry in a frenzy of angry finger pointing to distract us from the fact that we are being robbed blind by the "Epstein class". The issues are real, but these are relatively small issues in comparison. Those folks pay actual money to keep us doing this shit and it works. In the US we have a desperate need to understand that this is engineered, and the engineers are laughing their asses off at the screaming rabble.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You're not wrong... But the crossover age range of the vast majority of billionaires and seniors is a damned circle, it's both a class and age thing simultaneously. Boomers are usually defined as those born between 1946 and 1964, so that age range would be 62-80 as of 2026.

Nearly half of the 3,323 billionaires worldwide in 2023 were between 50 and 70 years old. Moreover, more than 40 percent were above 70 years, whereas around 10 percent were below 50 years.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/621046/age-distribution-of-billionaires-globally/

And that ignores the much larger number of them that are under a billion but still well on their way up towards it. In practicality, there's little difference between 100 million and a billion despite it being 90% less.

[–] guillem@aussie.zone 3 points 8 hours ago

Of those mentioned between 50 and 70 years old, the ones up to 61 are Gen X.

Also the trillionaire is Gen X.

I have seen so many boomers going to the front of demonstrations to make the police hold back their batons.

It's not a generational issue, it's a media bombardment of manufactured issues with a generational spin. In that picture we should be angry at not having enough benches for everybody instead of blaming the beneficiaries of that dumb sign.

[–] guillem@aussie.zone 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Pitting racism doesn't work so well with left-leaning audiences, so the billionaires try with ageism which is not so frowned upon. No demographic is without a wedge to exploit.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 10 hours ago

Also against homeless people, which everyone, even poor people with some sort of housing looks down upon.

[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Went canvassing for the first time today. So many seniors living in shitty homes. Fixed income at $900 and rent is still going up while no jobs exist for miles. We cant single out a generation and just blame them while material conditions worsen everywhere.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago

is that rural, lcol areas. we still have 1 story homes in our pretty expensive col area.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 27 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Or what? You get a ticket if you're not old enough? If you have a problem with not enough benches for everyone, maybe just make more benches? Not like they are expensive.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 3 points 10 hours ago

"Oh, sorry, I didn't see the notice. Maybe it should be more obvious."

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

$1500 plus installation and ongoing cleaning and maintenance, plus each one probably adds to insurance.

Better use of tax revenue than hiring another cop, though. In fact they could afford more benches if they fired a cop, that would be a good trade.

Whenever a city says they don't have the money, suggest they fire a cop.

[–] StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today 5 points 14 hours ago

Or suggest they don't spend money they don't have on flock mass surveillance cameras

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Whats the age are you considered a "senior"? I got the handicap part already, so thats nice...

(it actually sucks, but I make the best of it)

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

If my job role is senior that counts, right?

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

In my book... Yes.

/Sr Engineer that almost a senior, this is like inception shit! I need a pizza delivery guys, ladders, and firefighters STAT!

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah yeah yeah you're technically correct :)

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Not true! I was still a sophomore!

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Well played!

They held me back for one gym credit even though I played Football and Hockey since I was in HS in my Junior year. I quit school, fucked up their numbers and went to college a year early and aced my GED.

They begged me to come back, fuck that. I'm the asshole that will sue over 5 bucks and it costs me 1000 to get it back. I'm an idiot that way.

EDIT: I may have had another stroke.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I think it's 55

Edit: my info was based off of discounts so I was half right

Age 55 is generally not considered an official senior citizen by the government, though it marks the start of early senior status for housing, marketing, and select discounts.

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Dang almost there... Where do the years go eh?

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Not far behind you. It's all just been wasted fucking around, for me.

Youth is wasted on the young.

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Right? If I knew what I know now or had listen to the old guys I would be a millionaire... But nope, I knew better than any of them... Man I was a dumb kid.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Are you saying only boomers can be disabled?

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

They're saying it's absurd to try to stop anyone from using a public bench

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 5 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Where I live they also have housing exclusive to 55+ so it's much cheaper since there's a smaller market for them.

Ruins the housing economy and then holds some that's only available for themselves for cheap while they downsize for a massive nestegg.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Is it a problem that the 55+ housing lowers prices of other housing in the area, or that seniors are selling their old homes and actually keeping the money from the sale?

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

In the area I live in there's a lot of places 55+ so it limits the amount of housing in the city available to working class people and those trying to raise families, increasing their housing prices. The community has a lot of old folks.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

It is generally cheaper where I live because towns have to build affordable housing and it is considered more acceptable to have poor elderly people than poor people with children.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

The 55+ areas where I live are generally little rancher communities or apartments, some are low income type apartments but many are also luxury type apartments.

I could understand if the apartments or ranchers were built with accessibility in mind like shower bars and taller toilets, etc.

But mostly it's just because they don't like screaming children playing in the neighbourhood.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -1 points 12 hours ago

it should be more acceptable to be poor and childless than to drag someone into thw world without a way to support them.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

I'm disabled, but I'll gleefully cut the sign down and piss all over it in broad daylight. Anybody tries to stop me and it becomes a piss-coated harpoon. Every day if necessary, until they get the message.

That level of petty bullshit goes right back where it came from. I'm not at all opposed of going lower than my opponent - wtf are they going to do, try to get public and legal support for harassing a disabled person? Lmao

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Many boomers are struggling to make ends meet

[–] Duhtocqueville@ttrpg.network 1 points 15 hours ago

You mean “ends seat?”

load more comments
view more: next ›