this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
419 points (98.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

32619 readers
2188 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

ahh

~$ which cat
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

I was today's years old to finally notice the cat-head-tail thing...

But it also just recently dawned upon me why pacman has those weird "c" as progress indicators...

I'm not a smart man...

[–] HamsterRage@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For the past 30 years or so, my brain always tells me to type "last" instead of "tail". This usually results in some kind of "Permission denied" message that confuses me for a few seconds.

[–] shark_byte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there's a last command? just knowing that.

[–] HamsterRage@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but it shows information about recent/current logins and requires access a file called wtmp (or something like that, off the top of my head), and that requires privileged access.

My usual use case where I mix it up is looking at a log file and and I just want to see the last few entries. So my brain 🧠 tells my fingers to type "last logfile", and when I get the permission message it tells my mouth to go, "Doh!".

[–] shark_byte@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

yeah I looked it up

this will be handy

~$ last reboot
~$ last -s -7days
[–] dan@upvote.au 85 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

cat is misunderstood a lot. The purpose of cat is to combine multiple files together (it's literally short for "concatenate"), like cat *.log to combine all log files together.

If you're just using it for a single file, then you should just redirect the file to stdin. These two command lines behave similarly:

cat foo.txt | some-command
some-command < foo.txt

For head, tail, grep and some other commands, you can just pass in the file name directly as an argument (e.g. grep whatever foo.txt).

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 74 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] shark_byte@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

awww what's a cat without a head and a tail?

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

I guess depending on your interpretation of without it could either be "cat" or "a".

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qqq@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You'll see cat FILE | all the time because it's just a natural start to a pipeline. You cat FILE to see the content unfiltered before filtering it with further commands.

it’s just a natural start to a pipeline

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Fair, but in general I find it way more useful to use cat for piping.

In most cases I'll do something like

cat file | program
cat file | program | grep
cat file | program | grep | cut

This gets more complicated if the file is at the end of the command.

I don't know why anybody would disagree with this. It's a very clean way of putting it.

[–] dan@upvote.au 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It wouldn't be at the end, since you'd still be piping into program

program <file | grep | cut
[–] jxk@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And <file program | grep | cut works too

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lokalhorst@feddit.org 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

If I just want to look at the file, is there a better way than cat foo.txt? I guess I can't just do < foo.txt

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 15 hours ago

If it's really long, I use less , because it breaks it up into navigable pages instead of filling your entire buffer. :)

Never knew about just using < though! Cool!

[–] dan@upvote.au 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Admittedly I still use cat for this.

This also works too, but it's more verbose:

echo "$(<foo.txt)"

It's mentioned in the Bash man pages:

The command substitution $(cat file) can be replaced by the equivalent but faster $(< file).

EDIT: I was just informed that simply <foo.txt works too.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

how in the world is this not a useless use of echo and equivalent to <foo.txt

[–] dan@upvote.au 5 points 1 day ago

OK, TIL you can just do <foo.txt. I didn't think that worked. Thanks!

[–] mote@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago

So close! you have to do cat < foo.txt :-) (/s)

You can use less. There are also specialized ones for that purpose like bat.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I still like doing cat file.txt | grep thing because I often re-run it to find something else like cat file.txt | grep thing2 - and if I do that with grep, the pattern sits awkwardly in the middle instead of at the end

[–] tgt@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

< file.txt grep thing also works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shark_byte@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yeah sure but the command is literally written for the humor.

[–] dan@upvote.au 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I know, but I just wanted to mention this since a lot of new Linux users end up using cat this way :)

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bat is my favorite command to date.

[–] shark_byte@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago
~$ which bat
~$ bat man
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Another all-time favorite:

$ man woman  
No manual entry for woman  
$ touch woman
touch: cannot touch 'woman': Permission denied
[–] red_tomato@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

tac is a cat but faced the other way

[–] shark_byte@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago

ohhh let me check it out lol

[–] exu@feditown.com 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've been using a slightly customized bash-cat for years now. Still makes me smile when I see it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TwilightKiddy@scribe.disroot.org 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I always thought it's

head | cat | tail

It, of course, waits for an input, which brings up the one and only question...

Have you fed your cat?

[–] shark_byte@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

of course look meow meow so loud

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] darth_grunkus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›