Americans unironically thought that having a 401k means that you own the company.
this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)
badposting
828 readers
187 users here now
badposting is a comm where you post badly
This is not a !the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net alternative. This is not a !memes@hexbear.net alternative. This is a place for you to post your bad posts.
Ever had a really shitty bit idea? Joke you want to take way past the point of where it was funny? Want to feel like a stand-up comedy guy who's been bombing a set for the past 30 minutes straight and at this point is just saying shit to see if people react to it? Really bad pun? A homemade cringe concoction? A cognitohazard that you have birthed into this world and have an urge to spread like chain mail?
Rules:
- Do not post good posts.
- Unauthorized goodposting is to be punished in the manner of commenting the phrase "GOOD post" followed by an emoji that has not yet been used in the thread
- Use an emoticon/kaomoji/rule-three-abiding ASCII art if the rations run out
- This is not a comm where you direct people to other people's bad posts. This is a comm where you post badly.
- This rule intentionally left blank.
- If you're struck for rule 3, skill issue, not allowed to complain about it.
Code of Conduct applies just as much here as it does everywhere else. Technically, CoC violations are bad posts. On the other hand: L + ratio + get ~~better~~ worse material bozo
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Union pensions aren't even allowed to
There's an oldish article from a US Marxist going to a Chinese economics forum and giving a very horrified report back of people literally saying publicly traded corporations are publicly owned.
ITS COMMUNISM AND THATS WRONG
ITS COMMUNISM AND THATS GOOD
I do quite enjoy gambling
There’s two different versions of that guy. The first is a turbolib who argues that because anyone can buy shares in a public company, that means we already have communism. The second is a hyper-proto-capitalism traditionalist that think proper capitalism is when every company is owned by a single individual and any group ownership is no different than the USSR.
Why don't the workers just buy the means of production?
This would be true if only workers within the company owned the stock, and with maybe some exceptions of pensioners, there are no outside investors taking a share of the profit for no labor in return.
Though would it really be a stock market at that point?
That's more like syndicalism. If the means of production are cut into 100 million pieces and owned by the workers within the disparate companies rather than publicly owned, i.e. owned by everyone collectively, you do not have communism.
It stops being a stock market when you stop being able to buy and sell the stock.
Also it isn't communism if you can buy and sell the stock.
What if workers could trade or gift away a cut of their profit share to another worker within. Perhaps a senior worker who wants to reward a junior worker? Also this is totally my socialist pipe dream. I don't know how it would work completely but it's what I try to imagine as the first step into a post-capitalist mode of production and profit redistribution.
You're just trying to reinvent mondragon
There was literally a lib meme someone posted on slop like a week or two ago that said this exact thing
my bits can no longer compete with reality 
Spodermen Sanders
Oh that fucking sucks, I hate it.
You're welcome
and it's AI too 
I would have been surprised if it wasn't
I kinda think Henry Ford might have been one of these guys
Like I’m only halfway joking
I think Rothbard or one of the other libertarian jerkwads though index funds were communism