this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
113 points (90.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49421 readers
303 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: My own solution: when it happens, get off the computer and pet the dog.


So let's say I make a point on a post. I put forward my argument and I support it with evidence.

Now let's say the first comment is from someone who disagrees with me, but seems to fundamentally misunderstand what I am saying, probably because they read the title of the post and immediately posted the first thing that came to mind.

But my fear, acquired from Reddit, is that people are going to read this guy's totally inaccurate presentation of my argument and then every comment in the rest of the discussion will proceed as if that's what I said.

And since, as we all know, fear leads to hate, my first instinct is just to berate this person for being a stupid moron.

This is a bad strategy. Not only is probably against Lemmy rules, it automatically makes me the bad guy.

So: question: how do I handle this person without tediously restating my position again, which is extremely irritating because I already wrote it once and they didn't read it the first time. What I want is to say something that quickly quarantines the misreading comment in people's minds so the misreading doesn't infect the entire thread.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

How to handle it: don't

Let other people in the comments downvote and correct them.

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

But they don't correct them often, especially if it's a longer post that has some nuance to it. People here don't like nuance. I'm not sure nearly people anywhere do anymore. That would involve a reading and understanding people you actively disagree with.

[–] khanas1f@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

This is what I do

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 2 points 9 hours ago

I would try to clarify what I meant by re-wording it.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

And so began yet another opportunity for people to declare they're smarter or more neurodivergent (i.e. better) than everybody else.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I don't understand how neurodivergence has become a competition.

People just seem to self-diagnose to excuse their crappiness and like the worse you convince yourself you are adhd/autistic the more crappy you can behave.

I also baffles me like, just because you like trains or whatever man, doesn't mean you are neurodiverse... maybe you are just a nerd who likes trains.

and people in the comment here immediately defending their 'autism' as an excuse for why everyone else is terrible and they are super genisues... oi. Using your typical strawman and hyberbolic argumentation... but they are so 'logical'.

[–] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

My dad is more neurodivergent than yours!! /s

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

So you think you're always right, is that it?!?! You're saying everyone else is always wrong and you could never be wrong?!?!?!?! You think we're all a bunch of idiots who can't understand any of your big-brained ideas, because you're the only person smart enough to understand them?!??!?!?!?!??!?! So you think it's a waste of time to even try to explain your point?!??!?!??!?!!?!?!???!??!??!?!!?

Is that what you're trying to say?!1?1(1?11(1?1?1?1?1??1?1?????1?!!111??

spoiler/jk

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Autists deal with this daily, on lemmy and everywhere life.

Phase 1: explain

Phase 2: just let it go

And estimate in advance if you have the energy and motivation to get into it. Mostly I don't even get into it although I would really be happy for constructive exchange.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is the connection to autism? Why don't people understand you?

I often switch contexts in my head without informing my partner and assuming they'll know what I'm talking about.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Your answer kinda proves the point to me, meaning no disrespect.

The issue is we all are using the same words but neurotypical people rely heavily on reading and messaging between the lines, which we don't do. This results in the so called double empathy problem where there's a lot of issues in the communication.

Since 99% are usually neurotypical and 1% are autists, the norm is basically NT and we're the ones who have to deal with this on a daily basis. And since the knowledge of autism is actually way outdated for many people who do not actively concern themselves with this (and even most professionals, sadly), often people think of the really disabled autists and not fully capable people that have a biologically different brain causing this.

This pushes the issue to a wholly different level on highly functioning autists, aka nothing seems different but the struggles are absolutely real and the misunderstandings are on completely different levels e.g. a valid harmless query from the Autist to assess a situation is interpreted as a vile attack on a NT.

Psychologically and socially it's actually a highly interesting topic.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml 108 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Move on with your life who gives a fuck

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

BUT SOMEONE IS WRONG ON THE INTERNET!!!

:)

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't even see you reply because I pre-blocked you

;-) (kidding of course)

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Whether sarcastic or just meant straight up, I accept :D

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

I genuinely appreciated the humor. :-)

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

obtuse means round not pointy silly

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Not giving a fuck is an acquired skill for some

[–] despoticruin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Block and move on. It's not worth the effort. The points don't matter and the rules are all made up anyway.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

This has been a problem since the early days of usenet.

I suspect there is no good solution

[–] fratermus@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

I'll spend time clarifying a point for person who

  • seems to be asking/arguing in good faith
  • seems to be capable of understanding an answer

When it's not immediately obvious what kind of commenter is asking I glance at their posting history and annotate the account with a note/tag so I remember.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Make one clarifying point comment and then move on.

An example of how to do it:

You: EVs are better for the environment

Comment: Why are you saying that China should rule the world?

You: I'm saying that EV's are better for the environment no matter who makes them. Last comment.

An example on how not to do it:

You: EVs are better for the environment

Comment: Why are you saying that China should rule the world?

You: I never said that you asshole. Why are you sticking up for China, you fucking tankie. You're a troll piece of shit, etc., etc.,

Comment: You said China is amazing, you obviously want to go down on them

You: Why are you saying this shit? Etc., etc., etc. blah, blah, blah

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can see the scars, friend. Thank you for your service.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Lol, I should have prefaced with Reddit survivor.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] raspirate@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

At any point that I'm about to make a post online and I realize that the emotional energy required to continue engaging is more than I'm willing to commit to this particular discussion, I just bail. No reply, no downvote, just peace out. It's really not worth it.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

I do repeat myself. I will do it for awhile and usually this goes into a. Well we have fundamental differences of opinions and we are not going to go anywhere with it. You see much of our conversations and arguments have some fundamental things that the arguer has as postulates. Often times someone can not accept an argument because at its core is a postulate that they do not agree with.

Step 1. Remember the points don't matter

Step 2. Remember it doesn't matter if these people agree with you.

Step 3: Why should we even care if they mistook what we were saying

Step 4. If they agree feel ever so warm inside and justified in thinking what you thought... (Ignore all previous steps)

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 14 points 1 day ago

My rule to live by: never engage with comments online. I'll post a comment, but >99% of the time there is no reason to reply. I've said what I wanted. There's hardly anything to gain from trying to change anyone else's mind or elaborating further. Someone has to make it abundantly clear that they are responding in good faith to warrant a response. My life has been much better since I started doing this and I would strongly recommend everyone try it out.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Lemmy is becoming self aware

load more comments
view more: next ›