Bear in mind that we only hear about the most egregious and / or dumbest cases like these. Like with all crimes.
this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
307 points (99.7% liked)
Technology
87390 readers
4086 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah the number of times this is being used just a couple of times to track people is likely mind blowing. And with little to no oversight or repercussions
An officer in Saint Augustine Florida killed his girlfriend and took her house, and the local PD covered it up. When an independent investigator started poking around, they killed her too. They all got away with it. The cop’s sister lives in the house now.
I have no doubt this is not an isolated incident
I think vigilantism may achieve what legislators never will, because the public anger around Flock cameras is substantial.
That said, the most likely scenario in the US is that serious regulation of this tech won't materialize until a cop deletes their entire family that was hiding out after having obtained a restraining order.
I find the funniest part about this case is that flock has detailed logs on everything he did. Who could have guessed that the company dedicated to spying on everyone without a warrant would also be spying on the cops using the service? You wanna take bets on whether or not his usage was used to train an AI?
And yet they let him do it 717 times without reporting it. Company working as intended I guess.
Just because something is logged, doesnt mean its monitored like that.
Even without monitoring though when something does trigger someone to look, you now have a record.
They absolutely should have been monitoring for things like this though.
He's using it for what it was designed for. He could be a spokesperson for the company.
700 times? Is the woman a delivery driver who works double shifts? Send this pig to a physical therapist; its wrist must be fucked.
I'm not American and I see stuff about flock cameras everywhere. Can you ELI5 what are they about? Are they a speed camera registry that saves the video to a centralized database?
in America whenever you go to a supermarket (grocery) or diy (hardware) store there are giant poles mounted on industrial generators surrounded by lights and signs that track your every move.
They track cars, humans, literally everything. Society is one massive database. And the cops are basically given free reign to do whatever they want with that. That could include stalking people they don't like or their exes. In one case a dude got in his car drove for hours to get some legal weed in another state drove all the way home and they showed up to arrest him.
We're headed into a massively dystopian surveillance state where the government and major corporations will be able to monitor, plot, and plan for virtually everything that we do.
Edit: Downvoter: I normally don't care about your type because fuck random internet people, but why do you want a surveillance state? Boggles my fucking mind.
They are ALPRs (automatic license plate readers) which have a shared database around the country. Police from cities which have a contract with flock are able to search this database which is across the whole country.
They are not ALPRs at all. They can ID you with facial recognition, that's not a license plate.