It's certainly a waste of time.
No Stupid Questions
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
I only do that with accounts that are sus, like posting propaganda, ads, etc. To check if it is a bot and to report it.
"I went through your post history and so now I feel confident stereotyping you" is a borderline temp ban red flag, imo. It definitely indicates that the person is tilted hard enough, for one reason or another, to not take the discussion rationally and maybe need a break. If your community excludes certain harmful opinions then a post history check can be helpful for moderation, but using it to ad hominem someone in a discussion forum where all the important information should be in the discussion is flame war tactics and can lead to stalking.
Usually doesn't happen here to the degree it happens on reddit, but literally this week I had someone do it to try and claim that I hate cars because I post in /c/fuckcars@lemmy.world, even though I myself own two cars. Indeed, it was a stupid topic that dependably gets some people irrationally incensed, which primed this guy to try and make it personal.
Sometimes I'll check post and comment history if something seems a little off. For example, does this account show patterns you might see in a troll or bot?
Looking at votes though? That never even occurred to me, and even know I don't see what the point would be.
The only "creepy" thing about it is that viewing who upvoted/downvoted what isn't a feature that's just built into Lemmy (and Lemmy-UI). I can't imagine why the authors of Lemmy would want to have a class system with some (instance admins) being able to see vote information and others (everyone else) being unable.
You say "we all know our votes here are public record", but that's not really true. Even Lemvotes doesn't work for at least half of the posts I've tried it on. It'd be more accurate to say "we all know our votes here aren't secret".
I think there is an opt out(or disable option), at the instance level, for the specific mechanism that lemvotes uses.
I vaguely recall someone complaining that they were using something that was never intended to be used that way.
Never looked in to it so I can't be sure.
I used to ban people who repeatedly downvoted content on my conservative community but the last couple months I’ve stopped doing that and it hasn’t changed the vibe of the community at all.
Yet another example of how the pearl clutching about down votes is stupid.
I think its something I would have to encounter, and encounter enough, to be wierded out. If people do this I have no idea about it. I mean if Im thinking of blocking someone I look at their profile but that is mostly about comment and post history. I guess I should look and up and down voting because if someone is obviously brigrading I think I would want to block them.
I don't care, just seems like a waste of time and a bit childish IMO.
It's been a long time since it happened last, but I have experienced users claiming they have me flagged for something.
And sometimes when taken out of context a post can seem bad, but the times it has happened, the opinion quickly turned against them when they "called me out", and I explained the background.
I basically never see that anymore, IDK maybe I blocked them? Because generally those people are idiots.
The only time I check is to try and catch if I'm being targeted by someone mass down voting me or using alts to do so. Only when I'm seeing weird stuff like every one of my comments for a while getting at least one downvote, or seeing my comments deep in a one on one conversation on an otherwise dead thread getting multiple downvotes (no one's going to even see those except me and who I'm talking to).
Unfortunately, this has been a "you're only paranoid if they aren't out to get you" situation. Most give up after a day or two and I just block and move on, but it was a bit common for a few months.
I caught one of the "respected" members of my instance pulling that shit, a person who moderates multiple comms, downvoting me using their alts over multiple instances.
They accused me of doxxing them (they were actually around that time). Now I have a bunch of bans in my modlog saying that I used a slur, when I was quoting the name of an ancient meme and I edited the word out long before they did the bans.
(no one's going to even see those except me and who I'm talking to).
Untrue. Even one on one's in a public medium, are public. Lurkers have every right to opine on takes as they see fit, reply or platform-granted reaction tools both. Whether they catch the comments fresh or later when you consider it a "dead thread".
I personally do it all the time, upvote or downvote.
There's only so many hours in a day and Fediverse content isn't so plentiful that it makes sense to mark discussions that are still near the top of a comms feed as "dead" to me.
That's before we even get into how easy it is to accidentally hit the buttons in a lot of Lemmy client apps.
I'm well aware. I'm not talking about those situations. I'm talking ~20 comments deep on a thread that has seen no other action for multiple days. And I'm not talking about it just getting one downvote between when I reply from people happening to find it.
And even then, I just check. I'm not harassing people, I'm not jumping to immediately blocking. I'm just looking to see if it is something weird going on. If there is, I block.
And I haven't done any of this since last year. No need.
Just letting you know that I down voted this comment so you don't need to waste the time looking up who did it.
What? Ok?
This isn't a comment on a sub thread of a sub thread of an otherwise long dead thread jumping from no downvotes to -3 in like a single day (between the time I made my comment and the time I'm responding to the reply). I'm not actively watching this stuff and I think you've misunderstood what I'm talking about.
Now if you're going to check my profile page over the next few days to a week? Then I might notice the downvotes and look, but I honestly haven't noticed anything like that or checked votes against my comments since the event I mentioned in my last comment with that powermod, which was sometime last year.
Downvotes on a comment like mine, offering a semi-reasonable explanation for disliked behavior, are entirely expected. Hell, downvotes an any comment expressing an opinion.
TIL
WTFC
TMDV