this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
84 points (98.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49665 readers
553 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll give some examples:

  • defunding the prevention of food born illnesses leads to them becoming an issue in 2026

  • understaffing IT departments because "we don't have issues" then issues magically appear when support is taken away (surprised Pikachu face)

  • a magic witch preforms a yearly protection circle around your house, but you don't want to pay any more because the gremlin infestation is gone, but they come back after the protection circle dissipates

  • they put armed guards on merchant ships to prevent somali piracy, but then the pirates slowed down so the companies got complicit and now somali pirates are becoming an issue again

  • i (in my infinite stupidity) don't take my medicine because I feel fine, then after a few days I turn into a disaster pile of suicidal ideation and take my medicine to fix it

  • screw worms or something idk

but like the problem is in a loop where it just repeats forever because people don't realize what's preventing the issue

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tquid@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago

Chesterton's fence is mentioned several times here and it's a good heuristic to avoid the issue. The issue is called the Preparedness Paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preparedness_paradox

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

The concept you are describing is stopping preventative maintenance and discovering the consequences of said. I just don't have a word for it.

[–] coreray00@discuss.online 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Chesterton's fence

From a parable by G.K. Chesterton, suggesting that one should not remove a fence until one learns why it was erected in the first place.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Chesterton%27s_fence

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like your client messed up the original link somehow. It works fine for me.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

Ah true, might be a client problem

[–] coreray00@discuss.online 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Your link is broken, and that's the source anyway so I thought I'd just link directly

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Its not broken. It just links to wiktionary (wiki + dictionary), instead of wikipedia. I think the wiktionary explains it sufficiently.

[–] coreray00@discuss.online 1 points 22 hours ago

The url I posted doesn’t have any listed citations?

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 54 points 1 day ago
[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Complacency" is a related idea but a bit more general.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

Complacency gets close, though I think it's more for things where you don't act when you should, and what OP described could almost count as sabotage - the difference between not increasing the range of an alert system (complacency) and taking it down, in both cases because "we haven't had an alert in X time"

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

In software development this is called a regression, and it is why we have regression tests. If you don't run or check the regression tests, the problems they're testing for can (and do) come back.

[–] abrake@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

In 2013 Ruth Bader Ginsburg made a famous analogy about the US Supreme Court gutting the voting rights act. She said it's like "throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet." That comes pretty close to your sentiment, OP.

[–] No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org 3 points 21 hours ago

The thing with the witch sounds more like mafiosi protection money.
She sells you the circle, and if you don't pay, she casts summon goblins on your house

[–] 5318008@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

The best existing phrase I have is, "Dropping your guard."

It doesn't necessarily imply anything about why you dropped your guard, and only slightly implies that the bad thing happened while your guard was down.

We could coin a new phrase here by brainstorming. I'll start:

Fumbled the shield

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Like God said to Bender in Futurama "When you do things right, people won’t be sure you’ve done anything at all". I propose calling this Bender's Paradox.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

Vaccines and herd immunity

AKA the Sysadmin’s Creed

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Chesterton's Fence is the first thing that comes to mind

[–] muse@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Historical Recurrence

The gremlins always return. That's why the magic witch offers an annual subscription plan, to protect your investment from up to two types of folklore creatures, ranging from classical antiquity to the early modern period.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

My house was haunted by ghosts so bought the annual subscription and they went away. I canceled the subscription and my house got repossessed!

[–] lemmysmash@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago

In most of your examples I think the word is kakistocracy.

[–] doc@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There should be a word.

My father-in-law was not feeling well recently so we took him to the doctor. He presented with very high blood pressure and we were all asking him what happened to the blood pressure medicine he was taking for a decade. He replied, "I stopped taking it because last time they checked my blood pressure it was fine."

This absolutely needs a word.

[–] alternategait@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

This is closely related to all the people in the hospital who are like “I didn’t need all these meds and supportive oxygen at home. The hospital is making me sick!”

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

survivorship bias preceding confirmation bias? i think this what you were looking for. for example, survivorship happens first because, antibiotics work on bacterial infection, the infection dies down and backed by science, and personal accounts, then cofirmation bias sets, you are getting better, so you stop the antibiotics prematurely because you cant be still "infected". the infection comes roaring back, now immune to antibiotics, person blames the doctor/Rx or hospital for giving them useless meds. you can apply the same to all the other 4 situations.

i think 1 is different, theres an intentional motivation to do it, the food companies have to pay alot more to sanatize thier food, if they eliminate it, then they dont have to spend so much time doing it. 2)is also intentional, the company cuts corner, they are aware of breaches(baking it into thier profits)

3,4,5 all fits with surviorship bias preceding confirmation bias.

[–] magnetichuman@fedia.io 1 points 22 hours ago

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the results of the USA's (first, in case this ends up needing extra specificity later) civil war are a couple other examples.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

yes - recrudesence.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
  • These are all types of weak regulation, I think
  • Efficiency is an aim that can lead to this
  • Systemic Fragility, or low resilience is the result
  • Chesterton's Fence (a fence should not be removed until it is understood why it was built in the first place)
  • Short-sightedness is a cause
  • Not being able to see the wood for the trees is another
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Rebound?

Like if you have migraine headache, take a preventative but when you miss it the headache comes back worse, that's a rebound headache.

[–] phr@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago
[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I don't know a specific word, but I always think of it as "closing the umbrella because you're not getting wet"

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

To a certain extent you are describing normalcy bias but with an added bit of object impermanence.

[–] wallwood@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago
[–] proudblond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Fucking around and finding out

[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[–] slowtrain33@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago

In honor of his excellency “winning” the Iran war so many times, I propose we call it “pulling a Trump.”