this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
528 points (99.3% liked)

Mildly Interesting

27800 readers
1323 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmysmash@piefed.social 9 points 13 hours ago

They really have nothing else to worry about, do they? What a useless bunch of pricks...

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Moldova, the fuck do you care about this

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

The projection they went with is the Equal Earth. See a few comments below me for the projection itself.

A good choice, but tbh I feel the modified Dymaxion map would've been the best choice if only displaying land; or the Waterman butterfly.

If also water, then Tobler hyperelliptical., or Aitoff.

See here for a full list of map projections. I also like the Hao projection on there, but yeah.

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm just grateful they didn't go with the Gall-Peters, which often seems to be the favorite alternative, but always feels to me like it distorts almost every country.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Rare US-Israel disagreement

[–] luipaard0011@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Maybe Trump-Netanyahu were not voting here this time

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Zibitee@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like these projections make Antartica looks significantly larger than it reality. Is this thought correct?

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I mean, do not underestimate the size of Antarctica. It has the area of about two Australias (14.2 vs. 7.6 Mio. km²), and it's only somewhat smaller than South America (17.8 Mio. km²).
It does always look a bit larger as well, though, simply because it is unrolled at the bottom there.

(We're not gonna talk about Mercator, where it does look comically big...)

For the proper size, you'll have to look at a globe.
Wikipedia has little preview globes:

This webpage is also not too terrible for a 3D globe: https://www.webglearth.com/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 10 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Does it say which projection they're actually going to use?

[–] sp6@lemmy.world 29 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

According to this Guardian article:

the UN general assembly officially retired the 16th-century Mercator projection in favour of one based on the more accurate 2018 Equal Earth design

UN resolutions are non-enforceable, so I'm sure countries will implement it in different ways (some may not implement it at all). France has already said they will be using Eckert IV which is close to Equal Earth:

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Eckert and Equal Earth are fine, but I much prefer Peirce Quincuncial as more representative of the globe. All of the land distortion is minimal and equal, and it's tileable to get a better image of distance across hemispheres

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Klear@piefed.world 7 points 17 hours ago

Waterman butterfly

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›